RESEARCH
Intramedullary Nail- Versus Plate- Fixation for Humeral Fractures: A Review of Outcomes by Fracture Location .
Choosing between intramedullary nailing and plate fixation for humeral fractures remains a subject of intense debate in orthopaedic surgery. In this review, randomized trial evidence is evaluated, comparing these fixation strategies for proximal, shaft, and distal humeral fractures. By systematically reviewing outcomes such as fracture union, reoperation rates, and adverse events, the report examines whether anatomical location should influence surgical decision-making. With mixed findings across RCTs and conflicting signals from observational studies, the evidence landscape remains nuanced—highlighting the need for individualized clinical judgment and further high-quality research.
Already have an account? Log in
Part of an association? Click here, you may already have full access!
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
