To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:5| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

J Hand Surg Am. 2024 01-Jun;():. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.010

Contributing Authors:
JC Casey M Daher M Dworkin J Cusano J Garavito JA Gil

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eight studies including 548 patients with trigger finger were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing percutaneous A1 pulley release versus open A1 pulley release. Pooled outcomes of interest included revision rates, complication rates, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and return to normal activity. The meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences be...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue