ACE Report Cover
Ultrasound superior to palpation-guided injection of corticosteroid for plantar fasciitis
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
言語
Download Download Download
ダウンロード
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
引用
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ お気に入り
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
言語
Download Download Download
ダウンロード
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
引用
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ お気に入り

FOOT & ANKLE

Ultrasound versus Palpation-Guided Injection of Corticosteroid for Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2014;2(10):13 PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092671. eCollection 2014

寄稿者

Z Li C Xia A Yu B Qi

5 randomized control trials containing 149 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of ultrasound versus palpation-guided corticosteroid injections for plantar fasciitis. Patients who received ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections had a higher tenderness threshold, thinner plantar fascial thickness, and a lower incidence of hypoechogenicity compared to palpation-guided corticosteroid injections. Other outcomes including pain, the heel tenderness index, response rate, and heel pad thickness were not significantly different between groups.


出版資金提供の詳細 +
資金提供:
Non-funded
コンフリクト:
None disclosed

バイアスのリスク

9.5/10

報告基準

17/20

脆弱性指数

N/A

Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?

Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?

Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?

Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?

Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?

Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?

Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?

Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?

Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?

How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?

はい = 1

不確実=0.5

無関係 = 0

いいえ = 0

報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。

4/4

Introduction

3/4

Accessing Data

3/4

Analysing Data

4/4

Results

3/4

Discussion

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。

なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか?

Approximately 80% of all heel pain in adult patients is caused by plantar fasciitis. Conservative treatments for plantar fasciitis include rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, stretching, physical therapy, and foot padding. If these fail, patients tend to seek corticosteroid injections as an alternative treatment option. Various randomized control trials have compared ultrasound and palpation-guided corticosteroid injection for the treatment of plantar fasciitis, but the results are conflicting. Therefore, this meta-analysis was needed to determine the efficacy of ultrasound- versus palpation-guided corticosteroid injections.

主な研究課題は何ですか?

Is the efficacy of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections superior to palpation-guided corticosteroid injections for the treatment of plantar fasciitis?

研究の特徴 +
データソース:
An electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and EMBASE from inception to August 30, 2013. Reference lists from selected studies were also evaluated.
索引用語:
Index terms included: plantar fasciitis, heel pain, painful heel, ultrasound, sonograph, ultrasonography, palpation, unguided, and blind.
研究の選択:
Two investigators independently examined reports to ensure studies were randomized control trials that compared ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided injections in patients with plantar fasciitis, and reported one or more of the following outcomes: VAS, tenderness threshold (TT), heel tenderness index (HTI), response rate, plantar fascial thickness (PFT), hypoechogenicity, or heel pad thickness (HPT). Final results were confirmed by two senior authors. 5 RCTs (n=149) were selected for meta-analysis.
データ抽出:
Two investigators independently extracted data from the selected studies, including: first author, published year, location, sample size, average age, male/female ratio, body mass index (BMI), and intervention and study design. Any outcomes (mentioned in the study selection above) were also extracted, and the methodological quality of each study was assessed.
データ統合:
Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to analyze dichotomous data, while mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was used to analyze continuous variables. I-squared statistics determined statistical heterogeneity: if I-squared was <50%, a fixed-effects model was used, and if I-squared was >50%, a random effects model was used. Egger's Test determined publication bias among selected studies. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.2 and Stata version 12.0, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

重要な知見は?

  • All 5 RCTs in this meta-analysis reported VAS pain, and found pain was not significantly different between ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided corticosteroid injections (SMD= -0.35, 95%CI (-0.83, 0.14), p=0.16).
  • 2 studies reported that ultrasound-guided injections result in a higher tenderness threshold than palpation-guided injections (MD=2.17, 95%CI (1.28, 3.06), p=0.00).
  • 2 studies reported the heel tenderness index did not differ significantly between ultrasound- and palpation-guided injections (MD= -0.25, 95%CI (-0.63, 0.13), p=0.20).
  • 3 studies (93 patients) revealed that response rate did not differ significantly between groups (RR=1.29, 95%CI (0.94, 1.76), p=0.11).
  • 4 studies reported that ultrasound-guided injections resulted in thinner plantar fascial thickness than palpation-guided injections (MD= -0.12, 95%CI (-0.22, -0.01), p=0.03).
  • 3 studies reported that ultrasound-guided injections resulted in less hypoechogenicity than palpation-guided injections (RR=0.30, 95%CI (0.12, 0.77), p=0.01).
  • 2 studies reported heel pad thickness did not differ significantly between groups (MD=0.62, 95%CI (-1.84, 3.09), p=0.62), meaning no atrophy occurred.
最も覚えておくべきことは?

Patients who received ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections had a higher tenderness threshold, thinner plantar fascial thickness, and a lower incidence of hypoechogenicity compared to palpation-guided corticosteroid injections. Pain, heel tenderness index, response rate, and heel pad thickness were similar between groups.

それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか?

Based on the presented evidence, an ultrasound-guided injection of corticosteroid appears to be more effective than palpation-guided injections for plantar fasciitis. Additional well designed, high-quality, randomized control trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.

免責事項

このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。

0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
今月の無料記事閲覧数が4件に達しました。

週1.99ドルからOrthoEvidenceにアクセスできます。

最新のエビデンスにアクセスしてください。いつでもキャンセルできます。
  • 整形外科における最新のインパクトのあるランダム化比較試験とシステマティックレビューの批判的評価
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgeryとのコラボレーション、国際的に著名な外科医へのインタビュー、整形外科ニュースやトピックに関する座談会など、OrthoEvidenceポッドキャストコンテンツへのアクセス
  • 週2回発行されるエビデンスに基づくニュースレター、The Pulseの購読。
Upgrade
Close Dialog
おかえりなさい
パスワードをお忘れですか?
今すぐ無料トライアルを開始

あなたのアカウントは
OrthoEvidenceへの無料アクセスが含まれます。


または
パスワードをお忘れですか?

または
Eメールをご確認ください

入力されたメールアドレスにアカウントが存在する場合、パスワードリセットのメールが送信されます。メールが届かない場合は、迷惑メールフォルダをご確認ください。

その他のサポート サポートチームまでご連絡ください。.

この機能を有効にするにはログインしてください

この機能にアクセスするには、有効なOrthoEvidenceアカウントにログインする必要があります。ログインするか、無料トライアルアカウントを作成してください。

ACEレポートを翻訳

OrthoEvidenceは、多言語でコンテンツにアクセスできるようにするため、第三者の翻訳サービスを利用しています。正確性を確保するためにあらゆる努力をしていますが、翻訳が必ずしも完璧ではない可能性があることにご注意ください。

引用方法 ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Ultrasound superior to palpation-guided injection of corticosteroid for plantar fasciitis. OE Journal. 2014;2(10):13. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/ultrasound-superior-to-palpation-guided-injection-of-corticosteroid-for-plantar-fasciitis

引用のコピー
この機能を有効にするにはログインしてください

この機能にアクセスするには、有効なOrthoEvidenceアカウントにログインする必要があります。ログインするか、無料トライアルアカウントを作成してください。

プレミアム会員機能

この機能にアクセスするには、OrthoEvidenceのプレミアムアカウントにログインする必要があります。

共有 ACE Report