ACE Report Cover
Ultrasound superior to palpation-guided injection of corticosteroid for plantar fasciitis
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descargar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descargar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
FOOT & ANKLE
Ultrasound superior to palpation-guided injection of corticosteroid for plantar fasciitis .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2014;2(10):13 PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092671. eCollection 2014
Autores colaboradores

Z Li C Xia A Yu B Qi

5 randomized control trials containing 149 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of ultrasound versus palpation-guided corticosteroid injections for plantar fasciitis. Patients who received ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections had a higher tenderness threshold, thinner plantar fascial thickness, and a lower incidence of hypoechogenicity compared to palpation-guided corticosteroid injections. Other outcomes including pain, the heel tenderness index, response rate, and heel pad thickness were not significantly different between groups.


Detalles de la financiación de la publicación +
Financiación:
Non-funded
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Riesgo de sesgo

9,5/10

Criterios de información

17/20

Índice de fragilidad

N/A

Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?

Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?

Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?

Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?

Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?

Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?

Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?

Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?

Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?

How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?

Sí = 1

Incierto = 0,5

No relevante = 0

No = 0

La evaluación de los criterios de información evalúa la transparencia con la que los autores informan de las características metodológicas y del ensayo dentro de la publicación. La evaluación se divide en cinco categorías que se presentan a continuación.

4/4

Introduction

3/4

Accessing Data

3/4

Analysing Data

4/4

Results

3/4

Discussion

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

El Índice de Fragilidad es una herramienta que ayuda en la interpretación de hallazgos significativos, proporcionando una medida de fuerza para un resultado. El Índice de Fragilidad representa el número de eventos consecutivos que es necesario añadir a un resultado dicotómico para que el hallazgo deje de ser significativo. Un número pequeño representa un hallazgo más débil y un número grande un hallazgo más fuerte.

¿Por qué se necesitaba ahora este estudio?

Approximately 80% of all heel pain in adult patients is caused by plantar fasciitis. Conservative treatments for plantar fasciitis include rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, stretching, physical therapy, and foot padding. If these fail, patients tend to seek corticosteroid injections as an alternative treatment option. Various randomized control trials have compared ultrasound and palpation-guided corticosteroid injection for the treatment of plantar fasciitis, but the results are conflicting. Therefore, this meta-analysis was needed to determine the efficacy of ultrasound- versus palpation-guided corticosteroid injections.

¿Cuál era la pregunta principal de la investigación?

Is the efficacy of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections superior to palpation-guided corticosteroid injections for the treatment of plantar fasciitis?

Características del estudio +
Data Source:
An electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and EMBASE from inception to August 30, 2013. Reference lists from selected studies were also evaluated.
Index Terms:
Index terms included: plantar fasciitis, heel pain, painful heel, ultrasound, sonograph, ultrasonography, palpation, unguided, and blind.
Study Selection:
Two investigators independently examined reports to ensure studies were randomized control trials that compared ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided injections in patients with plantar fasciitis, and reported one or more of the following outcomes: VAS, tenderness threshold (TT), heel tenderness index (HTI), response rate, plantar fascial thickness (PFT), hypoechogenicity, or heel pad thickness (HPT). Final results were confirmed by two senior authors. 5 RCTs (n=149) were selected for meta-analysis.
Data Extraction:
Two investigators independently extracted data from the selected studies, including: first author, published year, location, sample size, average age, male/female ratio, body mass index (BMI), and intervention and study design. Any outcomes (mentioned in the study selection above) were also extracted, and the methodological quality of each study was assessed.
Data Synthesis:
Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to analyze dichotomous data, while mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was used to analyze continuous variables. I-squared statistics determined statistical heterogeneity: if I-squared was <50%, a fixed-effects model was used, and if I-squared was >50%, a random effects model was used. Egger's Test determined publication bias among selected studies. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.2 and Stata version 12.0, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
¿Cuáles fueron los hallazgos importantes?
  • All 5 RCTs in this meta-analysis reported VAS pain, and found pain was not significantly different between ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided corticosteroid injections (SMD= -0.35, 95%CI (-0.83, 0.14), p=0.16).
  • 2 studies reported that ultrasound-guided injections result in a higher tenderness threshold than palpation-guided injections (MD=2.17, 95%CI (1.28, 3.06), p=0.00).
  • 2 studies reported the heel tenderness index did not differ significantly between ultrasound- and palpation-guided injections (MD= -0.25, 95%CI (-0.63, 0.13), p=0.20).
  • 3 studies (93 patients) revealed that response rate did not differ significantly between groups (RR=1.29, 95%CI (0.94, 1.76), p=0.11).
  • 4 studies reported that ultrasound-guided injections resulted in thinner plantar fascial thickness than palpation-guided injections (MD= -0.12, 95%CI (-0.22, -0.01), p=0.03).
  • 3 studies reported that ultrasound-guided injections resulted in less hypoechogenicity than palpation-guided injections (RR=0.30, 95%CI (0.12, 0.77), p=0.01).
  • 2 studies reported heel pad thickness did not differ significantly between groups (MD=0.62, 95%CI (-1.84, 3.09), p=0.62), meaning no atrophy occurred.
¿Qué es lo que más debo recordar?

Patients who received ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections had a higher tenderness threshold, thinner plantar fascial thickness, and a lower incidence of hypoechogenicity compared to palpation-guided corticosteroid injections. Pain, heel tenderness index, response rate, and heel pad thickness were similar between groups.

¿Cómo afectará esto al cuidado de mis pacientes?

Based on the presented evidence, an ultrasound-guided injection of corticosteroid appears to be more effective than palpation-guided injections for plantar fasciitis. Additional well designed, high-quality, randomized control trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.

DESCARGO DE RESPONSABILIDAD

El contenido de esta página tiene únicamente fines informativos y no pretende sustituir el consejo, diagnóstico o tratamiento médico profesional. Si necesita tratamiento médico, busque siempre el consejo de su médico o acuda al servicio de urgencias más cercano. Las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista expresados por las personas sobre el contenido que se encuentra en esta página no reflejan las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista de OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 artículos mensuales GRATIS desbloqueados
Ha alcanzado su límite de vistas de 4 artículos gratuitos este mes

Acceda a OrtoEvidencia por tan sólo 1,99 $ a la semana.

Manténgase conectado con las últimas pruebas. Cancele en cualquier momento.
  • Valoraciones críticas de los últimos ensayos controlados aleatorizados de gran impacto y revisiones sistemáticas en ortopedia
  • Acceso al contenido del podcast OrthoEvidence, que incluye colaboraciones con el Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas con cirujanos reconocidos internacionalmente y mesas redondas sobre noticias y temas ortopédicos
  • Suscripción a The Pulse, un boletín quincenal basado en la evidencia y diseñado para ayudarle a tomar mejores decisiones clínicas
Upgrade
Bienvenido
¿Ha olvidado su contraseña?
Comience hoy mismo su prueba GRATUITA

Su cuenta estará afiliada a
e incluye acceso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
¿Olvidó su contraseña?

O
Compruebe su correo electrónico

Si existe una cuenta con la dirección de correo electrónico proporcionada, se le enviará un correo electrónico para restablecer la contraseña. Si no ve el correo electrónico, compruebe su carpeta de correo no deseado o spam.

Si necesita más ayuda póngase en contacto con nuestro equipo de asistencia.

Inicie sesión para activar esta función

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta activa de OrthoEvidence. Por favor, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta de prueba GRATUITA.

Traducir Informe ACE

OrthoEvidence utiliza un servicio de traducción de terceros para que el contenido sea accesible en varios idiomas. Tenga en cuenta que, aunque se hace todo lo posible para garantizar la exactitud, las traducciones no siempre son perfectas.

Cómo citar esto ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Ultrasound superior to palpation-guided injection of corticosteroid for plantar fasciitis. OE Journal. 2014;2(10):13. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/ultrasound-superior-to-palpation-guided-injection-of-corticosteroid-for-plantar-fasciitis

Copiar cita
Inicie sesión para activar esta función

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta activa de OrthoEvidence. Por favor, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta de prueba GRATUITA.

Función de miembro Premium

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta Premium de OrthoEvidence.

Compartir ACE Report