ACE Report Cover
The routine use of potent anti-coagulants following TJR is unnecessary
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
ARTHROPLASTY
The routine use of potent anti-coagulants following TJR is unnecessary .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

Meta-analysis of cause of death following total joint replacement using different thromboprophylaxis regimens

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):113-21

The findings of 70 publications, focusing on total joint replacement (TJR) which used some form of thromboprophylaxis, were combined to assess the effect of throboprophylaxis on mortality and proportion of deaths due to a known or suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) in modern TJR. 99441 patients were categorized into 7 groups based on the type of throboprophylaxis. Death occurred in 373 of the patients analysed; these deaths were then grouped by cause, including cardiopulmonary (excluding PE), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding, CNS, gastrointestinal and other. Results indicated that there was a very low mortality rate, regardless of thromboprophylaxis in TJR. The use of potent anti-coagulants (PA) did not reduce the mortality rate or the proportion of deaths due to a known or suspected PE and called in to question their routine use following TJR.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. The routine use of potent anti-coagulants following TJR is unnecessary. ACE Report. 2013;2(7):237. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/the-routine-use-of-potent-anti-coagulants-following-tjr-is-unnecessary

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report