Arthroscopy skills development with a surgical simulator: a comparative study in orthopaedic surgery residents

This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

この研究はハイインパクトの可能性があります。 OEのAI駆動型ハイインパクト指標は、論文が掲載されたジャーナルと論文自体の科学的内容の両方からのシグナルを統合することで、論文が持つ可能性の高い影響力を推定します。 最先端の自然言語処理を用いて開発されたOEハイインパクトモデルは、ジャーナルのインパクトファクターのみよりも、研究の将来の引用実績をより正確に予測します。 これにより、臨床的に意義のある研究をより早く認識することが可能になり、読者は将来の診療を形成する可能性が最も高い論文に集中することができます。

14 post graduate year (PGY) 1 and 2 residents were included in this study and were randomized to receive either arthroscopic training with a surgical simulator or traditional didactic training. The purpose of the study was to determine which training method was more effective in improving arthroscopic performance, as assessed with a checklist, time to procedure completion, and an assessment of arthroscopic handling using a subjective Injury Grading Index. Findings indicated that the simulator method resulted in a significantly reduced time to completion and better Injury Grading Index score in shoulder arthroscopy, and a trend towards reduced time to completion and better Injury Grading Index score in knee arthroscopy.