GENERAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Novel scaffold-based BST-CarGel treatment results in superior cartilage repair compared with microfracture in a randomized controlled trial
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
この研究はハイインパクトの可能性があります。
OEのAI駆動型ハイインパクト指標は、論文が掲載されたジャーナルと論文自体の科学的内容の両方からのシグナルを統合することで、論文が持つ可能性の高い影響力を推定します。
最先端の自然言語処理を用いて開発されたOEハイインパクトモデルは、ジャーナルのインパクトファクターのみよりも、研究の将来の引用実績をより正確に予測します。
これにより、臨床的に意義のある研究をより早く認識することが可能になり、読者は将来の診療を形成する可能性が最も高い論文に集中することができます。
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(20):4 J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1640-50Eighty patients aged 18 to 55 years, with a single focal cartilage lesion on the femoral condyles and moderate knee pain, were randomized to evaluate the efficacy of BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Bio-Orthopaedic Division) treatment in addition to conventional microfracture treatment and physiotherapy over 12 weeks. Patients were primarily assessed for repair tissue quantity and quality evaluated at 12 months by quantitative 3D MRI. The evidence presented in this study demonstrated that BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Bio-Orthopaedic Division) treatment resulted in superior cartilage tissue, increased quantity, and improved structural characteristics when compared to microfracture treatment alone. Secondary clinical outcomes (WOMAC and SF-36) were comparable between groups, along with similar safety outcomes.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
3/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
4/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
4/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
Microfracture is the current standard of care for articular cartilage damage and although this treatment has demonstrated success, the procedure may result in poor tissue quality and highly variable outcomes due to the instability of the marrow-derived blood clots formed in the lesion. BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Bio-Orthopaedic Division) was developed to stabilize the blood clot in the cartilage lesion by dispersing a soluble polymer scaffold containing chitosan (a crustacean exoskeleton glucosamine polysaccharide with desirable biomaterial properties) throughout the blood. The current evidence examining optimal interventions for articular cartilage damage suffers from low methodological quality, and this study was therefore needed to evaluate the efficacy of additional BST-CarGel in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the femoral condyle with microfracture.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Does BST-CarGel paired with microfracture treatment for symptomatic cartilage lesions of the femoral condyle result in superior repair cartilage quantity and quality compared to microfracture treatment alone, evaluated over 12 months?
重要な知見は？
- Baseline post-debridement lesion areas and volumes were each numerically greater for the BST-CarGel group (largest lesion: 6.77cm squared) compared to the microfracture group (largest lesion: to 4.46cm squared) (2.34 +/- 1.43 compared to 1.95 +/- 1.3cm squared; p= 0.20 and 0.95 +/- 0.82 vs. 0.70 +/- 0.53cm cubed; p= 0.12 respectively).
- At 12 months, lesions treated with BST-CarGel were filled with significantly more repair tissue (92.8% +/- 2.0%) compared to the microfracture group lesions (85.2% +/- 2.1%) (p= 0.011). BST-CarGel additionally resulted in more consistent outcomes in terms of producing a greater degree of filling.
- At 12 months, BST-CarGel treatment resulted in significantly lower (p= 0.033) adjusted T2 relaxation times (70.5 +/- 4.5ms) compared to the microfracture group (85.0 +/- 4.9ms). Note that a lower T2 relaxation time indicated an improved level of tissue quality.
- No significant differences between groups was observed for any WOMAC subscales at 12 months (all p> 0.05) and both treatments showed significant improvement from baseline in all 3 subscales (p< 0.0001).
- SF-36 scores revealed no significant differences between groups for any subscales (p> 0.05 for all), however the single-question Reported Health Transition item indicated that 75% BST-CarGel patients reported feeling “better than one year ago” compared to 60% in the microfracture group (p= 0.22).
- Reports of adverse events were similar between the BST-CarGel group (97.6%; 40 patients) compared to the microfracture group (92.3%; 36 patients). Most adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity with arthralgia being the most frequent (68.3% in the BST-CarGel group and 64.1% in the microfracture group).
- Procedure related adverse events were exhibited in 38 (92.6%) BST-CarGel group patients compared to 30 (76.2%) microfracture group patients. The BST-CarGel Group reported 5 patients (12.2%) with unanticipated device-related adverse events and 4 (9.8%) anticipated device-related adverse events that were mild to moderate in intensity. Three severe cascading unanticipated device-related adverse events occurred in a single patient.
最も覚えておくべきことは？
At 12 months, BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Bio-Orthopaedic Division) treatment resulted in superior cartilage tissue, increased quantity, and improved structural characteristics when compared to microfracture treatment alone. Secondary clinical outcomes were comparable between groups, along with similar safety outcomes.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
The evidence presented in this study suggested that BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Bio-Orthopaedic Division) treatment may be an effective addition to the treatment of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the femoral condyle. It is important to note that the findings of this study are limited by the relatively short follow-up period. Further study that examines long-term clinical benefit is warranted.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
