Sugammadex vs Neostigmine for Lung Aeration After Cervical Spine Surgery .
Effect of Sugammadex versus neostigmine reversal on lung aeration score after operative fixation of cervical spine: A prospective, double blinded, randomised control trial.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol . 2025 Jul-Sep;41(3):523-531.Seventy-eight patients with traumatic cervical spine injury (tCSI), were randomized as 38 received neostigmine and 39 received sugammadex; ultimately 37 vs 38 were included in analysis. The primary outcome was ultrasonographic LAS at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included extubation success in the OR, postoperative pulmonary complications (POPC) within 7 days, ventilator days, ICU days, tracheostomy, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were assessed at 24 h (LAS) and through 7 days (POPC). Overall, the results of the study revealed no between-group difference in 24-h LAS (P=0.63) or in any secondary outcome (e.g., POPC 27.0% vs 26.3%, P=0.944). A 24-h LAS cut-off of 4 predicted POPC with AUC 0.903, sensitivity 80%, and specificity 87.3%. In short, sugammadex did not improve postoperative lung aeration or clinical pulmonary outcomes versus neostigmine in tCSI; LAS itself may be useful for POPC risk stratification.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics