Small vs. Large Diameter Intramedullary Nails for Simple Diaphyseal Tibial Shaft Fractures .
Are small-diameter intramedullary nails enough for treating simple diaphyseal tibial fractures? A comparative study between small versus large nails
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3677-3681.Sixty patients with simple diaphyseal tibial fractures were randomized to receive fracture fixation with a small diameter (n=30) or a large diameter interlocking reamed intramedullary nail (n=30). The outcomes of interest included radiological exposure, operative time, time to union, the incidence of anterior knee pain, return to full knee range of motion, and post-operative complications. The small-diameter nail demonstrated longer time to union (15.2 weeks vs. 12.8 weeks, p=0.003), but with significantly less radiological exposure and operative time. However, clinical and radiological outcomes (incidence of anterior knee pain, return to full range of motion, incidence of implant failure, non-union) were comparable between the two groups. Small-diameter nails may offer comparable outcomes to long-diameter nails for the treatment of simple tibial shaft fractures.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics