Simple decompression is a viable alternative for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome .
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
Anterior Transposition Compared with Simple Decompression for Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2591-8This meta-analysis identified 4 randomized controlled trials that compared anterior ulnar nerve transposition (two submuscular and two subcutaneous) to single decompression for the treatment of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. A total of 335 patients (Mean age: 51; 65% male) were identified and the primary outcomes were motor nerve-conduction velocities and clinical outcome scores. Results from the analysis indicated that no significant difference in outcomes were seen between both interventions and simple decompression.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics