ACE Report Cover
Preoperative IV methylprednisolone does not mitigate loss of flexion-extension strength after TKA
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
ARTHROPLASTY
Preoperative IV methylprednisolone does not mitigate loss of flexion-extension strength after TKA .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2018;6(2):4 Acta Orthop. 2017 Oct;88(5):543-549

70 patients undergoing unilateral fast-track total knee arthroplasty were included in this trial to determine if a single preoperative dose of methylprednisolone can reduce the loss of knee-extension strength at discharge. Patients were randomized to receive a preoperative injection of methylprednisolone or placebo. Outcomes included knee extension strength (Nm/kg), knee circumference, the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, knee pain, on a visual analog scale, during knee extension strength test and TUG test, and C-reactive protein levels. There were no differences between groups in the loss of knee extension strength, knee circumference, timed up-and-go tests and knee pain. C-reactive protein levels were significantly reduced in the methylprednisolone group at 24 and 48 hours.


Publication Funding Details +
Funding:
Not Reported
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Risk of Bias

9/10

Reporting Criteria

20/21

Fragility Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Yes = 1

Uncertain = 0.5

Not Relevant = 0

No = 0

The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.

4/4

Randomization

4/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

4/5

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.

Why was this study needed now?

Many patients face strength deficit in the knee following total knee arthroplasty. The inflammatory response following surgery has been theorized to be a potential major contributor to extension strength deficit. Therefore, modifying the inflammatory response with a corticosteroid, such as methylprednisolone, may help mitigate strength loss after total knee arthroplasty.

What was the principal research question?

In total knee arthroplasty, does preoperative intravenous methylprednisolone lead to a significantly smaller drop in knee extension strength when compared to placebo saline, assessed at discharge?

Study Characteristics +
Population:
70 patients, 55-80 years of age, scheduled for primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia.
Intervention:
Methylprednisolone group: Patients were administered a single, intravenous injection of methylprednisolone 135mg (Solu-Medrol; Pfizer). (n=35; 33 analyzed) (Mean age: 65 [55-79])
Comparison:
Placebo group: Patients were administered a single, intravenous injection of placebo saline. (n=35; 28 analyzed) (Mean age: 69 [56-80])
Outcomes:
The primary outcome was change in knee extension strength (Nm/kg), assessed via maximum isometric force. Secondary outcomes included knee circumference 1cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, and knee pain, on a visual analog scale, during knee extension strength test and TUG test.
Methods:
RCT; Blinded
Time:
Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at discharge.
What were the important findings?
  • Reduction in knee extension strength from baseline to discharge did not significantly differ between the methylprednisolone group (-1.04Nm/kg [range; 0.22-1.9]) and the placebo group (-1.02Nm/kg [range; 0.22-1.6]) (p=0.8).
  • The increase in VAS pain from baseline to discharge, during both strength testing and TUG test did not significantly differ between the methylprednisolone group and the placebo group (p=0.7 and 0.1, respectively).
  • The increase in knee circumference from baseline to discharge did not significantly differ between the methylprednisolone group (+3.6cm [range; -1.5, 6.5]) and the placebo group (+3.8cm [range; 0.8-7.2]) (p=0.7).
  • C-reactive protein levels were significantly reduced at 24 and 48 hours in the methylprednisolone group compared to the placebo group (P<0.001)
  • The increase in TUG test time from baseline to discharge did not significantly differ between the methylprednisolone group (+16s [range; 2.9-40]) and the placebo group (+17s [range; 0.6-53]) (p=0.8).
What should I remember most?

In total knee arthroplasty, intravenous methylprednisolone 125mg did not have a significant effect on knee extension strength mitigation when compared to intravenous placebo saline.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

The results of this study suggest that intravenous methylprednisolone in total knee arthroplasty does not have a significant benefit on early clinical parameters after surgery, including knee extension strength, knee pain, swelling, and function. Additional research should be undertaken to identify optimal strategies in recovery knee strength and function following total knee arthroplasty.

DISCLAIMER

This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.

0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Your account will be affiliated with
and includes free access to OrthoEvidence


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

How to cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Preoperative IV methylprednisolone does not mitigate loss of flexion-extension strength after TKA. OE Journal. 2018;6(2):4. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/preoperative-iv-methylprednisolone-does-not-mitigate-loss-of-flexion-extension-strength-after-tka

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report