Physical therapy versus conventional treatment for acute ankle sprains .
Physical therapy versus conventional treatment for grade I and II acute ankle sprains: trial sequential analysis and meta-analysis.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Sep 29;20(1):861.Ten randomized controlled trials including 565 patients with grade I and II acute ankle sprains were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive physical therapy or conventional treatment. Physical therapy interventions included exercise therapy, ultrasound therapy, thermotherapy, hydrotherapy, stretching, and functional rehabilitation, while conventional treatments included RICE (rest, ice, compression, elevation) treatment, standard care, placebo therapy, and cast immobilization. The primary outcome of interest was post-treatment pain measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included VAS pain at rest, VAS pain during exercise, and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Outcomes were assessed from a few days up to six weeks post-intervention. Overall, the results of the study revealed that physical therapy resulted in significantly greater pain reduction compared with conventional treatment, particularly for pain at rest, while no significant differences were observed for dorsiflexion range of motion.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics