ACE Report Cover
Pain and function improved with Hyalgan in treatment of knee OA in the Asian population
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
OSTEOARTHRITIS
Pain and function improved with Hyalgan in treatment of knee OA in the Asian population .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(18):20

. 2011 ;():.

Contributing Authors

TL Huang CC Chang CH Lee SC Chen CH Lai CL Tsai

200 patients were randomized to investigate the efficacy of sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the Asian population. Patients were allocated to receive 5 weekly intra-articular (i.a.) injections of Hyalgan or saline placebo, and were followed-up for 20 weeks afterward. The results indicated that patients who were treated with i.a. sodium hyaluronate experienced significantly improved pain and function compared to those treated with placebo saline solution.


Publication Funding Details +
Funding:
Industry funded
Sponsor:
Hyalgan is kindly provided by Fidia Farmaceutici SpA and Med Pharma Co., Ltd.
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Risk of Bias

7.5/10

Reporting Criteria

15/20

Fragility Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Yes = 1

Uncertain = 0.5

Not Relevant = 0

No = 0

The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.

2/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

2/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.

Why was this study needed now?

Common primary treatment of knee osteoarthritis usually consists of simple analgesics, but when pain can no longer be effectively reduced, a therapy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is adopted. Although NSAIDs possess well documented pain relief and anti-inflammatory effects, serious gastrointestinal side-effects have been reported with their use. A preferential alternative to NSAIDs has been intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan), but despite extensive research on a worldwide scale, only one study has been dedicated to investigating the efficacy of such treatment in an Asian population.

What was the principal research question?

Did 5 weekly intra-articular injections of 20-mg/2mL sodium hyaluronate effectively reduce pain compared to 2mL of placebo saline solution, when measured after 25 weeks from the beginning of therapy?

Study Characteristics +
Population:
200 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (knee pain with at least one of the following conditions: >50 years old, crepitus, or morning stiffness <30 minutes in duration). (n=176 completed follow-up)
Intervention:
Hyalgan group: Patients received intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate (20-mg/2mL) once a week for 5 weeks. (n=88 completed follow-up)
Comparison:
Placebo group: Patients received intra-articular injection of saline placebo (2mL) once a week for 5 weeks. (n=88 completed follow-up)
Outcomes:
Primary outcome was pain reduction on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) during the 50-foot walking test. Secondary outcomes were pain, stiffness, and function through subsections of the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), time required to complete the 50-foot walking test, synovial effusion volume of the knee, patient and investigator subjective scoring of effectiveness (scale 1 to 6), and acetaminophen consumption.
Methods:
RCT, Double Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Prospective
Time:
Evaluation was conducted at baseline, 5 weeks (ie. end of injections), 13 and 25 weeks.
What were the important findings?
  • Pain (VAS) on the 50 foot walking test was reduced from 45.15mm to 21.53mm (baseline to week 25) in the placebo group and 47.85mm to 17.00mm in the Hyalgan group. The difference in pain at week 25 (P=0.035) and the overall reduction of pain (0.002) were statistically significant, favoring the Hyalgan group.
  • Pain and function, as assessed by WOMAC subscales, was significantly reduced with sodium hyaluronate compared to the placebo (P=0.0050 and 0.0038, respectively). Significance was detected by week 5 and carried through for the remainder of the study.
  • Although WOMAC stiffness scores were generally more improved in the Hyalgan group, there was no significant difference in this outcome between groups for the duration of the study.
  • Both groups achieved slight reduction from baseline 50-foot walking test, with no significant difference.
  • No difference was observed in the amount of synovial fluid of the knee between treatment groups.
  • Patient and investigator rating of therapy effectiveness did not significantly differ between groups.
  • There was no difference in acetaminophen consumption between groups for the duration of the study.
What should I remember most?

The 5-injection administration of 20-mg/mL sodium hyaluronte provided improved pain (100-mm and WOMAC subscale) and function (WOMAC subscale) compared to saline placebo in an Asian population. Difference was detected after 5 weeks and held through to the end of the study at 25 weeks.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

The results of this study support the use of sodium hyaluronate for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the Asian population. For a more robust understanding of the efficacy of Hyalgan in the Asian population, future studies should consider outcomes in the long-term and employ Minimum Important Differences (MIDs).

DISCLAIMER

This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.

0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Your account will be affiliated with
and includes free access to OrthoEvidence


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

How to cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Pain and function improved with Hyalgan in treatment of knee OA in the Asian population. OE Journal. 2013;1(18):20. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/pain-and-function-improved-with-hyalgan-in-treatment-of-knee-oa-in-the-asian-population

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report