OTA 2020: Higher Risk of Major Limb Complication with Modern Ring Fixation vs Internal Fixation .
A Prospective Randomized Trial to Assess Fixation Strategies for Severe Open Tibia Fractures: Modern Ring External Fixators versus Internal FIxation (FIXIT Study)
A total of 254 patients with high-energy open tibia fractures were randomized to receive modern ring external fixation (n=122) or internal fixation (n=132). The primary outcome was rehospitalization or same day surgery for at least 1 of 6 major limb complications (infection, amputation, non-union, malunion, loss of reduction and/or hardware failure, or soft-tissue problems). The results revealed that external fixation was associated with a significantly higher risk of at least 1 major limb complication within 1 year follow-up vs internal fixation (RD=20.9% [95%CI 8.3%, 32.8%]; p=0.002). No statistically significant difference in the risk of at least 1 deep surgical site infection was observed between the internal fixation and modern ring fixation groups (RD=-3.5% [95%CI -14.8%, 7.8%]; p=0.54).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics