PERI-OPERATIVE
Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection
この研究はインパクトが大きい可能性があると判断されました。
OEのAIによるハイインパクト指標は、論文が掲載されたジャーナルと論文自体の科学的内容の両方からのシグナルを統合することで、論文の影響力を推定します。
最先端の自然言語処理を用いて開発されたOEハイインパクトモデルは、ジャーナルのインパクトファクターのみよりも、研究の将来の引用実績をより正確に予測します。
これにより、臨床的に意義のある研究をより早く認識することができ、読者は将来の診療を形成する可能性が最も高い論文に焦点を当てることができます。
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2022;10(1):10 N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5): 425-436.これは私の診療にとって何を意味するのでしょうか？
The results of this study suggest that oral antibiotics are non-inferior to intravenous antibiotics for the management of bone and joint infection, as measured by treatment failure. Moreover, oral antibiotics are associated with a shorter length of stay and fewer complications compared to intravenous treatment. This study was limited by the open label design and potential differences in follow-on treatment. This study challenges the widely accepted standard use of intravenous antibiotics for bone/joint infection.
研究概要
1054 patients being treated for bone or joint infection at 26 UK centers were randomized in this non-inferiority trial to receive 6 weeks of oral antibiotic therapy (n=527) or 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotic therapy (n=527). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of definite treatment failure. Secondary outcomes of interest included the rate of treatment discontinuation, catheter complications, diarrhea caused by C.difficile, serious adverse events, length of hospitalization, and patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Hip and Knee Scores [OHS; OKS]; EuroQual-5Dimension scores [EQ-5D]). Outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year follow-up. Oral antibiotics were found to be non-inferior to intravenous antibiotics with regards to the risk of definitive treatment failure. The incidence of early discontinuation of treatment and catheter complications, and length of hospitalization were significantly higher in the intravenous group, however, no differences in the incidence of diarrhea or serious adverse events were observed between the two groups. EQ-5D scores and OHS scores were not significantly different between groups at 4 months and 1 year post-treatment, however, OKS scores were better in the oral group at both time points.
なぜ今この研究が必要だったのですか？
Patients with bone and joint infection require prolonged antibiotic treatment, which is frequently delivered intravenously. However, the use of intravenous antibiotics has been associated with additional complications and higher costs vs. oral antibiotics. Therefore, it is of interest to determine whether oral antibiotics can provide an non-inferior management of bone and joint infection.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
In patients with acute or chronic bone/joint infection, is oral antibiotic therapy non-inferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy with respect to treatment success, within 1 year post-randomization?
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
