ACE Report Cover
No benefit of external vs internal rotation for immobilization after shoulder dislocation
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
SHOULDER & ELBOW
No benefit of external vs internal rotation for immobilization after shoulder dislocation .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
High Impact
This study has been identified as potentially high impact. OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself. Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone. This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.

Immobilization in External Rotation Versus Internal Rotation After Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):521-32
Contributing Authors

DB Whelan SN Kletke G Schemitsch J Chahal

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the use of immobilization in external rotation versus internal rotation after primary anterior shoulder dislocation were selected for the current meta-analysis. Pooled comparisons were conducted for outcomes of recurrence, disease-specific quality of life, and compliance. Overall, there was no significant difference between external rotation and internal rotation in recurrence rate, nor in subgroup analyses based on mean study patient age or length of immobilization protocol. No significant differences were observed in pooled Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) Scores or compliance rate.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. No benefit of external vs internal rotation for immobilization after shoulder dislocation. ACE Report. 2016;5(5):14. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/no-benefit-of-external-vs-internal-rotation-for-immobilization-after-shoulder-dislocation

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report