NMES or RT exercises show similar functional improvement for patients with knee OA .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(4):37 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 3;13:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-11841 patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis were randomized into three groups to assess the efficiency of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in strengthening the quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM). Patients received home-based resistance-training (RT), NMES; or standard care. At 14 weeks, similar and significant improvements in functional capacity were seen for the RT and NMES groups compared to the control group and baseline measures.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Oui = 1
Incertain = 0,5
Non pertinent = 0
Non = 0
L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.
3/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
3/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
3/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.
Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?
Quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM) weakness is a common symptom of those suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA), many programs place emphasis on strengthening this muscle group. However, its effectiveness is dependent on good adherence, which can be challenging to achieve for patients with significant knee OA. Due to these limitations, interest has risen in the use of neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) to strengthen the QFM. Currently, no studies have compared a home-based NMES program to a home-based exercise program for patients with knee OA.
Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?
Did a home-based NMES program show provide similar benefits compared to a home-based exercise program in strengthening the QFM, assessed over a 14 week period?
- No significant intergroup differences in the functional tests were seen between the RT and NMES groups at any time point, but both showed significant improvements compared to the control group at weeks 8 and 14 (P < 0.005).
- No between-group differences were seen in self-reported disability after therapy.
- The only significant intra-group changes were improvements in WOMAC pain score from week 1 to week 8 in favour of the NMES group (P = 0.004); WOMAC physical function for the NMES group at week 13 relative to week 1 (P = 0.004), and an increased SF-36 physical health for the NMES group at week 8 relative to week 1 (P = 0.005).
- No between-group or intra-group differences were reported in isokinetic or isometric quadriceps peak torque after therapy (weeks 8 and 14 relative to week 1).
- Quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) was greater (p < 0.005) in the NMES and RT groups at week 8 than week 1 (+5.4% for NMES, +4.3% for RT); there was no difference in quadriceps CSA between the two groups at week 8 (p = 0.404).
- Adherence to the 6-week intervention was not significantly different between the two groups (NMES 91.3%, RT 83.3%, p = 0.324).
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?
The study revealed that 6 weeks of NMES or RT exercise resulted in similar and significant improvements in functional performance in patients with moderate to severe knee OA. However, the study found significant intra-group improvements in WOMAC pain and SF-36 physical health for the NMES group, and a trend towards significant intra-group improvements in SF-36 physical and mental health for the RT group at the end of the treatment.
Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?
The use of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation program is an acceptable alternative to resistance training, as it can significantly improve functional performance in patients with moderate to severe OA. Future studies will require a longer follow-up to establish the optimum frequency, intensity, and safety of NMES training.
AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ
Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
