ACE Report Cover
Muscle Energy Technique Vs Facet Joint Mobilization For Chronic Neck Pain
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
SPINE
Muscle Energy Technique Vs Facet Joint Mobilization For Chronic Neck Pain .

Comparison of muscle energy technique and facet joint mobilisation in the patient with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

J Pak Med Assoc . 2024 Jan;74(1):10-15.
Contributing Authors

H Tabassum M Mariam KS Gondal

105 patients with chronic neck pain were assigned to receive either muscle energy techniques (MET; n=35), facet joint mobilization (FJM; n=35), or conventional physical therapy (CPT; n=35). The primary outcome measured was the reduction in neck pain, while secondary outcomes included improvements in disability, cervical lordosis, and range of motion (ROM). Assessments were conducted at baseline, two weeks, and four weeks post-intervention. Overall, the results revealed significant improvements in pain, disability, and ROM in both MET and FJM groups compared to the CPT group, with MET showing superior outcomes in certain ROM parameters. The study suggests that MET and FJM are effective in managing chronic neck pain, with potential for improved patient outcomes compared to conventional therapy.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Muscle Energy Technique Vs Facet Joint Mobilization For Chronic Neck Pain. ACE Report. 2024;306(7):71. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/muscle-energy-technique-vs-facet-joint-mobilization-for-chronic-neck-pain

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report