ACE Report Cover
Methylprednisolone injections improve symptom severity and rate of surgery for CTS
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descarregar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descarregar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos

HAND & WRIST

Methylprednisolone used for the carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(18):17 Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 3;159(5):309-17

Autores contribuintes

I Atroshi M Flondell M Hofer J Ranstam

111 patients experiencing symptoms of classic or probable carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with failed wrist splinting treatment, were randomized to evaluate the long-term, dose-response efficacy of 80mg and 40mg of methylprednisolone injections on symptom severity and rate of surgery, over a 1 year period. The use of methylprednisolone of either dose demonstrated superior improvements in symptom severity at 10 weeks compared to placebo but no significant differences were found after 1 year. Rates of surgery were 73%, 81%, and 92% for 80mg, 40mg and placebo patients respectively.


Detalhes do financiamento da publicação +
Financiamento:
Non-Industry funded
Patrocinador:
Region of Scania Research and Development Foundation and Hassleholm Hospital Organization
Conflitos:
None disclosed

Risco de viés

8,5/10

Critérios de notificação

19/20

Índice de Fragilidade

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sim = 1

Incerto = 0,5

Não relevante = 0

Não = 0

A Avaliação dos Critérios de Relato avalia a transparência com que os autores relatam as caraterísticas metodológicas e do ensaio na publicação. A avaliação está dividida em cinco categorias que são apresentadas de seguida.

4/4

Randomização

3/4

Medições dos resultados

4/4

Inclusão / Exclusão

4/4

Descrição da terapia

4/4

Estatística

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

O Índice de Fragilidade é uma ferramenta que auxilia na interpretação de achados significativos, fornecendo uma medida de força para um resultado. O Índice de Fragilidade representa o número de eventos consecutivos que precisam de ser adicionados a um resultado dicotómico para que o resultado deixe de ser significativo. Um número pequeno representa um resultado mais fraco e um número grande representa um resultado mais forte.

Porque é que este estudo era necessário agora?

Carpal tunnel release surgery in the United States is performed yearly in almost 25 women and 13 men per 10,000 adults. The surgery itself results in good outcomes for affected patients but often presents with surgery-related pain, hand weakness, and further complications. Theoretically speaking, an equally effective, nonsurgical method could address these limitations, and recent evidence has supported the use of steroid injections in carpal tunnel surgery (CTS). No previous studies have reported on long-term benefits of steroid usage, or the dose-response relationship, and therefore this study was needed to determine the efficacy, symptom severity and risk of surgery associated with 1 year of first-time local injection of 2 different doses of methylprednisolone in idiopathic CTS patients.

Qual era a principal questão de investigação?

Is the use of 80mg or 40mg methylprednisolone in treatment for CTS an effective nonsurgical intervention for reducing syndrome symptoms, assessed over a period of 1 year?

Caraterísticas do estudo +
População:
111 patients with primary idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) aged 18 to 70 years, with symptoms of classic or probable CTS (with unsuccessful 2-month treatment). Selected patients were referred for surgery based on symptom severity and nerve conduction test results that indicated median neuropathy at the wrist.
Intervenção:
80mg methylprednisolone Subgroup: Patients received 2mL (80mg) of methylprednisolone plus 1mL of lidocaine. (n= 37; all analyzed; Mean Age: 47 SD 12 years; M/F= 11/26) 40mg methylprednisolone Subgroup: Patients received 1mL (40mg) of methylprednisolone plus 1 mL saline plus 1mL of lidocaine. (n= 37; all analyzed; Mean Age: 44 SD 11 years; M/F= 10/27)
Comparação:
Placebo Group: Patients received 2mL of saline plus 1mL of lidocaine (n= 37; all analyzed; Mean Age: 49 SD 11 years; M/F= 9/28)
Resultados:
Primary end points measured change in CTS symptom severity at 10 weeks and the rate of surgery at 1 year. Time to surgery and change in CTS symptom severity score at 1 year, as well as the short Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey bodily pain score, SF-6D, and treatment satisfaction at 10 weeks and 1 year, were measured as secondary end points.
Métodos:
RCT: Single-Centered: Double-Blinded
Tempo:
Patients contacted at 5-weeks (via telephone), assessed at 10 weeks and 1 year

Quais foram os resultados importantes?

  • CTS symptom severity scores at 10 weeks improved more for methylprednisolone treated patients compared to placebo (p=0.003 for 80mg and p<0.001 for 40 mg). The mean change from baseline in the three groups at 10 weeks was -0.90 SD 1.0 for 80mg, -1.17 SD 0.95 for 40mg, and -0.30 SD 0.66 for placebo. No significant difference was found between the two methylprednisolone groups.
  • At 10 weeks, patients who pursued surgery had exacerbated symptom severity scores compared with patients who did not pursue surgery (Mean Difference= 1.15; p> 0.05)
  • At 1 year, 73%, 81% and 92% of patients had surgery in the 80mg, 40mg and the placebo groups, respectively. 80mg subgroup patients had a decreased likelihood of having surgery 1 year after injection compared with placebo (OR 0.24 p= 0.042); however, this was not significant for the 40mg subgroup compared with placebo (p> 0.05). Relative risk for surgery was 0.79 (p= 0.039) and 0.88 (p= 0.180) for the 80mg and 40mg methylprednisolone subgroups, respectively
  • Time from injection to surgery was significantly longer for both intervention methylprednisolone subgroups (p= 0.003 for 80mg; p= 0.022 for 40mg) when compared against the placebo group. Methylprednisolone receiving patients exhibited a lower likelihood of undergoing surgery compared with the placebo patients (Hazard Ratio 0.46, p= 0.003 for 80mg; Hazard Ratio 0.57, p= 0.026 for 40mg). No difference was found for likelihood of surgery between methylprednisolone subgroups (Hazard Ratio: 0.81; p= 0.42)
  • Quick DASH, SF-36 bodily pain, SF-6D, and treatment satisfaction were superior in both methylprednisolone subgroups compared with placebo (all p< 0.025), however long term analysis demonstrated no differences between groups for the listed measures at 24 weeks and 1 year (all p> 0.100).
  • Rate of patient reported pain after injection was higher in methylprednisolone subgroups (24 patients) compared with the placebo group (6 patients; p< 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred and all pain was resolved within 2 weeks
  • Patients with higher nerve conduction abnormality and baseline symptom severity benefited more from methylprednisolone. 80mg methylprednisolone subgroup patients demonstrated a greater improvement at 10 weeks for pinch strength (p= 0.44) and monofilament sensation (p= 0.010) compared with placebo. No other differences were observed (p> 0.100).
De que é que me devo lembrar mais?

The use of both doses of methylprednisolone (80mg and 40mg) in treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) demonstrated significant improvements in CTS severity scores, when compared to the placebo at 10 weeks; however, this effect was no longer apparent at 24 weeks, and final 1 year follow-up. 1 year-rates of surgery were 73%, 81% and 92% in 80mg methylprednisolone, 40mg methylprednisolone, and placebo groups respectively. 80mg methylprednisolone administered patients were less likely to undergo surgery, and both methylprednisolone subgroups had greater time to surgery. Finally, subgroup analyses indicated that 80mg methylprednisolone resulted in superior outcomes for pinch strength and monofilament sensation when compared against placebo.

Como é que isto afectará o tratamento dos meus doentes?

The use of methylprednisolone injections for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in affected patients is beneficial in the relief of symptom severity at 10 weeks and in reducing the rates of surgery after 1 year after treatment. However it should be noted that 3 of 4 patients still had surgery within 1 year. Future research should focus on conservative treatments that resolve carpal tunnel syndrome related symptoms and reduce the need for surgery.

AVISO LEGAL

O conteúdo desta página destina-se apenas a fins informativos e não pretende substituir o aconselhamento, diagnóstico ou tratamento médico profissional. Se necessitar de tratamento médico, procure sempre o conselho do seu médico ou dirija-se ao serviço de urgência mais próximo. As opiniões, crenças e pontos de vista expressos pelos indivíduos no conteúdo encontrado nesta página não reflectem as opiniões, crenças e pontos de vista da OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 artigos mensais GRATUITOS desbloqueados
Atingiu o seu limite de 4 visualizações de artigos gratuitos este mês

Aceda à OrthoEvidence por apenas $1,99 por semana.

Mantenha-se ligado às últimas evidências. Cancele a qualquer altura.
  • Avaliações críticas dos mais recentes ensaios clínicos aleatórios de alto impacto e revisões sistemáticas em ortopedia
  • Acesso ao conteúdo do podcast OrthoEvidence, incluindo colaborações com o Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas com cirurgiões reconhecidos internacionalmente e discussões em mesa redonda sobre notícias e tópicos ortopédicos
  • Subscrição do The Pulse, um boletim informativo duas vezes por semana baseado em evidências, concebido para o ajudar a tomar melhores decisões clínicas
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bem-vindo de volta!
Esqueceu-se da palavra-passe?
Comece hoje o seu teste GRATUITO!

A sua conta será afiliada a
e inclui acesso gratuito ao OrthoEvidence


OU
Esqueceu-se da palavra-passe?

OU
Verifique o seu e-mail

Se existir uma conta com o endereço de e-mail fornecido, ser-lhe-á enviado um e-mail de reposição da palavra-passe. Se não vir uma mensagem de correio eletrónico, verifique a sua pasta de spam ou de lixo eletrónico.

Para obter mais assistência, contacte a nossa equipa de apoio.

Inicie sessão para ativar esta funcionalidade

Para aceder a esta funcionalidade, tem de iniciar sessão numa conta OrthoEvidence ativa. Inicie a sessão ou crie uma conta de avaliação GRATUITA.

Traduzir o Relatório ACE

A OrthoEvidence utiliza um serviço de tradução de terceiros para tornar o conteúdo acessível em vários idiomas. Tenha em atenção que, embora sejam feitos todos os esforços para garantir a exatidão, as traduções podem nem sempre ser perfeitas.

Como citar isto ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Methylprednisolone injections improve symptom severity and rate of surgery for CTS. OE Journal. 2013;1(18):17. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/methylprednisolone-injections-improve-symptom-severity-and-rate-of-surgery-for-cts

Copie a citação
Inicie sessão para ativar esta funcionalidade

Para aceder a esta funcionalidade, tem de iniciar sessão numa conta OrthoEvidence ativa. Inicie a sessão ou crie uma conta de avaliação GRATUITA.

Funcionalidade de Membro Premium

Para aceder a esta funcionalidade, tem de ter sessão iniciada numa conta Premium da OrthoEvidence.

Partilhe isto ACE Report