PHYSICAL THERAPY & REHAB
Massage therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized dose-finding trial
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(9):49 PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030248. Epub 2012 Feb 8125 patients were randomized to evaluate the efficacy of massage therapy in treating knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients received one of four 8-week programs of Swedish massage regimen (30 or 60 min weekly or biweekly) or a Usual Care control. The results at 8 weeks revealed that the 60-minute massage groups displayed significantly better improvements than the control group in the WOMAC subscales of pain and functionality, as well as the VAS pain scale. However, no significant differences were observed in range of motion.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
3/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
2/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
4/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
Currently, about 27 million Americans are affected by osteoarthritis (OA), a progressive degenerative disease of the joints. While massage therapy could be an effective option to manage OA pain, there are relatively few studies that examine the efficacy of this treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to identify a dose and treatment regimen of an 8-week Swedish massage therapy for knee OA that would be both optimal (provide greatest effectiveness) and practical (minimize patient cost and inconvenience).
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Did a Swedish massage regimen provide better clinical outcomes for the treatment of knee OA than Usual Care control, assessed at 24 weeks?
重要な知見は？
- WOMAC Global score displayed a significant improvement (24.0 points, 95% CI range: 15.3-32.7) in the 60-minute massage groups compared to Usual Care (6.3 points, 95% CI range: 0.1-12.8) after 8 weeks; no statistically significant differences were observed between massage groups at this time point.
- For the WOMAC pain subscale, all massage groups produced significant improvement (P < 0.05) from baseline at weeks 8, 16, and 24 for the three highest doses of massage (groups 2, 3, and 4), while no improvement was seen in the Usual Care at any time point (P > 0.05).
- According to the VAS scale, pain perception improved significantly (31.2-39.8 points, 95% CI range: 22.9-48.1 points) in both 60-minute dose groups (groups 3 and 4) compared to Usual Care at 8 weeks, although there were no significant differences between groups 3 and 4.
- Decreased pain perception was observed in all treatment groups at all time points compared to baseline.
- While every group (except group 1 at week 8) displayed decreased time to walk 50 feet at all times, there were no significant differences between the groups at any time point (P > 0.05).
- No significant between-group differences were observed in range of motion after 8 weeks; however, all massage groups changed in the positive direction.
最も覚えておくべきことは？
This study demonstrated that there was more improvement in the WOMAC Global scores with greater total dose (minutes) of massage. At 8 weeks 16 and 24, every massage group displayed significant improvements in WOMAC Global scores compared to baseline, a change unseen in the Usual Care group.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
This study established an optimal dose of 60-minute Swedish massage therapy (once weekly in 8 weeks) regimen for OA of the knee. While this type of intervention is difficult to conclusively prove its efficacy, physicians may be inclined to prescribe massage therapy as a possible conservative treatment for patients with painful OA.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
