Long Term Outcomes Of Spinal Fusion vs Non-Surgical Treatment in Chronic Radicular Lumbar Disease .
Comparative study of long-term efficacy of spinal fusion surgery and non-surgical treatment for chronic radicular lumbar disease.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) . 2025 Mar 17;71(1):e20240902.Ninety-three patients with chronic radicular lumbar spondylopathy were randomized to receive either spinal fusion surgery (n=47) or conservative non-surgical treatment (n=46). The primary outcome of interest was overall clinical efficacy. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rate, pain severity, lumbar function recovery, and quality of life. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after treatment. Overall, the results of the study revealed that the surgical group had a higher total effective rate, lower recurrence rate, and significantly better pain relief, lumbar function scores, and quality of life measures at 1 year compared to the non-surgical group. The findings suggest that spinal fusion surgery provides superior long-term outcomes for chronic radicular lumbar spondylopathy.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics