Long-term effects of arthroplasty vs. internal fixation in treating femoral neck fractures .
Does Arthroplasty Provide Better Outcomes Than Internal Fixation At Mid- and Long-term Followup? A Meta-analysis
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2672-9.11 randomized control trials, with a minimum of 4 years follow-up, comparing arthroplasty (either total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty) to internal fixation for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures were included for analysis. The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether treatment with arthroplasty resulted in long-term differences in mortality and/or re-operation risk compared to internal fixation. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of long-term effects on hip function and risk of complications. Pooling of results indicated that treatment with arthroplasty resulted in a significantly decreased risk of re-operation, a significantly increased risk of hip dislocation, and no significant difference to mortality up to 10 years after treatment, as compared to internal fixation. Functional improvement was significantly greater for patients receiving arthroplasty up to 6 years after treatment, but no difference in function was seen between groups at 6-10 years after treatment.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics