Influence of isostretching on patients with chronic low back pain. A randomized controlled trial
Questo rapporto è stato verificato
da uno o più autori della
pubblicazione originale.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2021;9(6):20 Physiother Theory Pract . 2021 Feb;37(2):287-294Riassunto dello studio
Fifty-four patients diagnosed with chronic low back pain were randomized to undergo an isostretching exercise program or a control group (no treatment; waiting listed for physical therapy). Primary outcomes of interest included pain and function were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), respectively. Additional outcomes included quality of life measured using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey and associated sub-scores (i.e. functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health status, mental health, emotional aspects, social aspects, and vitality). Furthermore, patient and evaluator satisfaction, as well as number of diclofenac pills consumed, were also evaluated. All outcomes were measured at 20-days and 45-days follow-up. Results revealed that in the isostretching exercise group, VAS mean and RMDQ values both statistically significantly improved over time (p<0.001 for both), but not in the control group (p>0.05 for both). The improvement over time in VAS and mean RMDQ scores was statistically significantly greater in the isostretching group (p=0.003; p=0.026). The number of diclofenac pills consumed were also statistically significantly less in the isostretching group at 20-days and 45 days follow-up compared to the control (p=0.03 for both). For quality of life outcomes, the improvement over time in functional capacity, physical aspects and general health status subscores was statistically significantly greater in the isostretching group (p=0.012; p=0.011; p=0.006, respectively); however, all other sub-scores were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Finally, patient satisfaction at both 20 and 45 days follow-up was statistically significantly better in the isostretching group compared to the control group (p<0.001 for both). The same pattern was observed for the evaluator satisfaction.
Sblocca il Rapporto ACE completo
Ha accesso a 4 altri articoli GRATUITI questo mese.
Clicchi qui sotto per sbloccare e visualizzare questo ACE Reports
Sblocca ora
Valutazioni critiche dei più recenti studi randomizzati controllati ad alto impatto e revisioni sistematiche in ortopedia.
Accesso ai contenuti del podcast OrthoEvidence, comprese le collaborazioni con il Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, le interviste con chirurghi di fama internazionale e le tavole rotonde sulle novità e gli argomenti ortopedici
Abbonamento a The Pulse, una newsletter bisettimanale basata sulle evidenze scientifiche, progettata per aiutarla a prendere decisioni cliniche migliori.
Accesso esclusivo ad articoli di contenuto originale, tra cui revisioni sistematiche interne, e articoli sui metodi di ricerca sanitaria e su argomenti ortopedici scottanti.
Oppure faccia l'upgrade oggi stesso e acceda a tutti i contenuti di OrthoEvidence a soli 1,99$ a settimana.
Ha già un account? Effettui il login
È affiliato ad una delle nostre associazioni partner?
Clicchi qui per ottenere l'accesso gratuito tra i vantaggi dei membri della sua associazione!
Si abboni a "L'Impulso"
Ortopedia basata sull'evidenza direttamente nella sua casella di posta elettronica. ABBONARSI
