ISAKOS: Similar clinical outcomes using AMP and TT techniques in ACL reconstruction .
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Transtibial versus Anteromedial Portal Drilling Techniques for Clinical Results in the Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction
70 patients requiring double-bundle ACL reconstruction were randomized to receive treatment using either the anteromedial portal technique for femoral tunnel drilling or the transtibial technique to observe differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Results indicated that there was no difference in Lachman test results, pivot shift test results, side-to-side differences of KT-2000, Lysholm scores, subjective and objective IKDC scores or isokinetic muscle strength between the two groups. However the anteromedial technique did place the tunnels closer to the native ACL foot print.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
