Higher survival & similar recovery in liberal vs restrictive transfusion in hip fractures .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2015;3(24):40 Acta Orthop. 2015 Jun;86(3):363-72284 elderly patients who underwent surgical hip fracture treatment were randomized to either restrictive or liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusions within the first 30 postoperative days. The purpose of this study was to determine whether RBC transfusion techniques were associated with clinical outcomes such as increased physical recovery or reduced mortality after surgery. Findings showed that implementation of either restrictive or liberal RBC transfusions resulted in comparable physical recovery, however; liberal RBC transfusions may increase 30day survival.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Ja = 1
Ungewiss = 0.5
Nicht relevant = 0
Nein = 0
Die Bewertung der Berichtskriterien bewertet die Transparenz, mit der die Autoren die methodischen und studienspezifischen Merkmale der Studie in der Veröffentlichung angeben. Die Bewertung ist in fünf Kategorien unterteilt, die im Folgenden vorgestellt werden.
4/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
3/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
4/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Der Fragilitätsindex ist ein Instrument, das bei der Interpretation signifikanter Ergebnisse hilft und ein Maß für die Stärke eines Ergebnisses liefert. Der Fragilitätsindex gibt die Anzahl der aufeinanderfolgenden Ereignisse an, die zu einem dichotomen Ergebnis hinzugefügt werden müssen, damit das Ergebnis nicht mehr signifikant ist. Eine kleine Zahl steht für ein schwächeres Ergebnis und eine große Zahl für ein stärkeres Ergebnis.
Warum wurde diese Studie jetzt benötigt?
Perioperative blood loss is common in hip fracture patients and could lead to acute anemia as defined by <12g/dL and <13g/dL of haemoglobin in women and men, respectively. Anemia in frail elderly patients may be associated with reduced ambulation and functional independence, resulting in an overall worsening performance of activities of daily living. Additionally, elderly hip fracture patients are also at an increased risk of mortality, relative to those without such injuries. There has been increased Interest in improving outcomes and mortality risk in this population, and specifically in whether the method of red blood cell transfusion plays a role. Multiple RCTs have been conducted on this topic, however very few frail elderly patients were included in such studies. Anemia is predicted to be the cause of mortality in this population, therefore, a randomized study with a populace of frail elderly patients with hip fractures to determine optimal Hb transfusion targets was required.
Was war die wichtigste Forschungsfrage?
Does a restrictive versus a liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy correlate with the degree of physical recovery and mortality after hip fracture surgery in frail, elderly patients, as assessed up to 90 days postoperatively?
- Nursing home patients (96%) were significantly more frail than sheltered housing residents (78%), assessed at baseline (p<0.001)
- Physical abilities were impaired in patients of both transfusion groups, assessed at 10 postoperative days (p<0.001)
- The Modified Barthel index score showed comparable results between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups through equal means (p=0.3)
- No significant differences were found between groups in the 30-day (HR: 1.8 [95% CI 0.7, 3.6]; p=0.1) or 90-day (HR: 1.4 [95% CI 0.9, 2.2]; p=0.2) mortality rates in the intention to treat analysis
- Subgroup analysis showed a higher mortality rate among those living in nursing homes in the restrictive strategy group compared to the liberal group (HR: 2.0 [95% CI 1.1, 3.6]; p=0.01)
- Significant differences were seen in Hb measurements between the restrictive transfusion group (mean Hb levels of 11.3 g/dL 95% CI 11.3 to 11.4) and the liberal group (12.2 g/dL 95% CI 12.2 to 12.3, p<0.001)
Was sollte ich mir besonders merken?
Comparable rates of physical recovery were seen in both restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion groups for hip fractures in elderly patients. Mortality rates were found to be higher in the restrictive transfusion group compared to the liberal transfusion group at 30-day post-op, as well as in nursing home patients compared to sheltered housing patients when assessed at 90 days post operation.
Wie wird sich dies auf die Behandlung meiner Patienten auswirken?
Based on the findings of this study, liberal RBC transfusion appears to improve 30-day mortality rate compared to restrictive RBC transfusion, although physical recovery is comparable between the two treatments in frail elderly hip fracture patients. Patients receiving transfusions in a nursing home seem to have a higher mortality rate compared to sheltered homes. Further research should be done to investigate results of liberal RBC transfusion strategy in nursing homes to possibly improve mortality rate.
HAFTUNGSAUSSCHLUSS
Der Inhalt dieser Seite dient nur zu Informationszwecken und ist nicht als Ersatz für professionelle medizinische Beratung, Diagnose oder Behandlung gedacht. Wenn Sie eine medizinische Behandlung benötigen, wenden Sie sich immer an Ihren Arzt oder suchen Sie die nächstgelegene Notaufnahme auf. Die Meinungen, Überzeugungen und Standpunkte, die von den Personen auf dieser Seite geäußert werden, spiegeln nicht die Meinungen, Überzeugungen und Standpunkte von OrthoEvidence wider.
0 von 4 monatliche KOSTENLOSE Artikel freigeschaltet
