ESWT vs. HILT in Treating Calcaneal Spur Related Symptoms: Clinical and Functional Outcomes .
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of calcaneal spur-related symptoms: clinical outcomes and functional improvement.
J Orthop Surg Res . 2025 Apr 19;20(1):393.Ninety patients with calcaneal spur-related symptoms were randomized to receive either Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) (n=45) or High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) (n=45). The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and functional outcomes (Foot Function Index [FFI]). Secondary outcomes included range of motion (ROM), Roles and Maudsley scores, and AOFAS scores. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and three months. Overall, the study revealed significant improvements in pain and functional scores in both groups, with ESWT demonstrating slightly superior improvements in functional outcomes compared to HILT. The main findings suggest that both ESWT and HILT are effective non-invasive treatments for calcaneal spur, with ESWT showing marginally better functional outcomes.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics