Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) vs. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in THA .
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block in total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther . 2025 May 15;57(1):90-98.Ninety elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block (n=30), a lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) (n=30), or no block (control group, n=30). The primary outcome was total opioid consumption over 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first rescue opioid, quadriceps strength, and inflammatory markers (NLR and PLR). Outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Overall, the results revealed that both ESPB and PENG blocks significantly reduced opioid consumption and pain scores, prolonged time to rescue analgesia, and lowered stress markers compared to control. ESPB preserved quadriceps strength better than PENG. These findings suggest both blocks enhance recovery, with ESPB offering potential motor-sparing advantages.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics