Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release
Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: A randomized trial.
J Hand Surg Am . 2025 Aug;50(8):979-984.One hundred twenty-three patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) were randomized (unbalanced 3:1) to endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) (n=91) or open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)(n=32). The primary outcomes were CTS Symptom Severity Scale scores and nerve/vascular complications assessed by a blinded evaluator. Secondary outcomes included McGill Pain Questionnaire scores, grip and pinch strength, sensory threshold, time to return to work, and long-term satisfaction/re-operation. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 weeks, with long-term contact at a mean of 3.2 years. Overall, the results revealed no between-group differences in primary outcomes at any time and no nerve/vascular complications in either group; ECTR showed transient advantages in grip and pain at 1 and 6 weeks that dissipated by 12 weeks. In conclusion, ECTR and OCTR yielded similar benefits, with ECTR’s early recovery not translating into earlier return to work and accompanied by a higher re-operation rate (5% vs 0%).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics