ACE Report Cover
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
HAND & WRIST
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release

Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: A randomized trial.

J Hand Surg Am . 2025 Aug;50(8):979-984.

One hundred twenty-three patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) were randomized (unbalanced 3:1) to endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) (n=91) or open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)(n=32). The primary outcomes were CTS Symptom Severity Scale scores and nerve/vascular complications assessed by a blinded evaluator. Secondary outcomes included McGill Pain Questionnaire scores, grip and pinch strength, sensory threshold, time to return to work, and long-term satisfaction/re-operation. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 weeks, with long-term contact at a mean of 3.2 years. Overall, the results revealed no between-group differences in primary outcomes at any time and no nerve/vascular complications in either group; ECTR showed transient advantages in grip and pain at 1 and 6 weeks that dissipated by 12 weeks. In conclusion, ECTR and OCTR yielded similar benefits, with ECTR’s early recovery not translating into earlier return to work and accompanied by a higher re-operation rate (5% vs 0%).

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release. ACE Report. 2025;307(11):40. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/endoscopic-versus-open-carpal-tunnel-release

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report