Early Outcomes with Medial Pivot vs Posterior Stabilized Knee System in Total Knee Arthroplasty .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Early Outcomes of Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Posterior-Stabilized Design: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun; 12(2): 178–186.Eighty patients scheduled for a bilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive medial pivot knee implant systems or posterior-stabilized knee implant systems. The outcomes of interest included knee flexion, physical performance test results (timed up and go test, stair climb test, self-paced walk test, chair to stand test, leg holding test), the new Knee Society Score results, EQ-5D quality of life results and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) results. Outcomes were assessed at 2 years post-operation. The medial pivot implant group reported significantly worse knee flexion, including a worse performance from baseline when compared to the posterior-stabilized knee implant group. However, improvements in the timed up and go and self-paced walk test results were significantly in favour of the medial pivot implant group. Improvement from baseline in the objective new Knee Society Scores were significantly greater in the posterior-stabilized group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the remaining outcomes.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
