COA-ACO2018: Dynamic versus static fixation methods for syndesmosis injuries .
Dynamic vs. Static Fixation of Acute Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-Analysis
Eight randomized controlled trials or cohort studies were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis which compared functional outcome, hardware removal rate, and malreduction rate between dynamic fixation and static fixation of syndesmosis injuries. Functional outcomes were pooled at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results demonstrated significant differences in favour of dynamic fixation compared to static fixation for Olerud Molander score at 6 months, and AOFAS scores at 3 and 6 months. Differences between fixation methods at 12 months were not significant for either measure. Rates of hardware removal and malreduction were significantly lower among dynamic fixation groups compared to static fixation groups.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
