COA 2024: Navigated vs Conventional TKA -- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs .
Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials
Twenty studies with patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing conventional TKA vs. navigated TKA. Pooled outcomes of interest included radiographic alignment, revision, and functional outcomes. The pooled results showed that navigated TKA achieved significantly better alignment in the coronal planes for both tibial and femoral components, and in the sagittal plane for the tibial component only. However, there was no significant difference in short-term clinical survivorship or functional outcomes between the two techniques. These findings suggest that while navigated TKA offers improved radiographic alignment, the clinical and functional benefits remain similar to conventional TKA.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics