Cervical Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion: SR of RCTs With >7 Year Follow-up .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1875-1884.Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 2,664 patients were included in this systematic review comparing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) (n=1,464) vs. anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) (n=1,200). All included RCTs had a minimum of 7 years of follow-up. The outcomes of interest included overall success rate, functional and pain scores, range of motion, adjacent segment syndrome, adverse events, and reoperation. The pooled analyses found that CDA had a significantly better overall success rate, better neck function, less arm pain, better physical quality of life and range of motion, lower rates of adjacent segment syndrome, and a lower rate of reoperation compared to ACDF, suggesting that it could be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of cervical disc diseases.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
