Biplane Ultrasound vs Fluoroscopy for Guidance of Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Insertion .
Biplane Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy for Guidance of Percutaneous Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Insertion : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2025 May 15;50(10):686-693.Sixty-eight patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomized to biplane ultrasound guidance (US) (n=34) or fluoroscopy (n=34) for percutaneous lumbar intervertebral foramen insertion (PLIFI), with a prespecified learning-curve split yielding a proficiency subset (n=23) for the US arm. The primary outcomes were first-attempt success, number of puncture adjustments, number of radiographs, puncture time, and operator confidence; secondary outcomes included operative time, complications, pain/disability scores, and satisfaction up to 3–6 months (procedure-dependent). Overall, the results of the study revealed that at proficiency, biplane US increased first-attempt success, reduced fluoroscopies, decreased puncture time, and required fewer adjustments, with similar clinical outcomes and no puncture-related complications. In short, biplane US provided a faster, more accurate, and lower-radiation workflow for PLIFI once basic proficiency was achieved.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics