Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: Open repair effective in reducing recurrence rates .
Este estudo foi identificado como tendo um impacto potencialmente elevado.
A métrica de Alto Impacto da OE, baseada em IA, estima a influência que um artigo poderá ter, integrando sinais da revista em que foi publicado e do conteúdo científico do próprio artigo.
Desenvolvido com recurso ao mais avançado processamento de linguagem natural, o modelo High Impact da OE prevê com maior precisão o desempenho futuro de um estudo em termos de citações do que o fator de impacto da revista por si só.
Isto permite o reconhecimento precoce de investigação clinicamente significativa e ajuda os leitores a concentrarem-se nos artigos com maior probabilidade de moldar a prática futura.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(11):273 Arthroscopy. 2007 Feb;23(2):118-23.76 patients with first-time traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder joint were randomized to either receive open Bankart surgical repair, or conservative treatment. This study aimed to compare rates of recurrence between treatments. The results at both the two year and ten year follow up periods indicated that open repair reduced the recurrence rate of shoulder dislocations in comparison to conservative treatment.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Sim = 1
Incerto = 0,5
Não relevante = 0
Não = 0
A Avaliação dos Critérios de Relato avalia a transparência com que os autores relatam as caraterísticas metodológicas e do ensaio na publicação. A avaliação está dividida em cinco categorias que são apresentadas de seguida.
1/4
Randomization
2/4
Outcome Measurements
3/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
3/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
O Índice de Fragilidade é uma ferramenta que auxilia na interpretação de achados significativos, fornecendo uma medida de força para um resultado. O Índice de Fragilidade representa o número de eventos consecutivos que precisam de ser adicionados a um resultado dicotómico para que o resultado deixe de ser significativo. Um número pequeno representa um resultado mais fraco e um número grande representa um resultado mais forte.
Porque é que este estudo era necessário agora?
Dislocations of the shoulder joint are the most frequent type of dislocations in the body. With traumatic anterior dislocation, there is a high risk recurrence; however, it is still uncertain if surgical repair of Bankart lesions produces a significant reduction in recurrence compared to conservative treatment. Recurrent instability of the shoulder joint can negatively affect one's performance in daily activities as well as sports. This study is of importance, as there have been few long-term, high quality studies looking at surgical versus conservative treatments.
Qual era a principal questão de investigação?
Does open Bankart surgical repair of lesions reduce the rate of recurrence of dislocations, as compared to conservative treatment, in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations, over a ten year follow up period?
- At the two year follow up period, 1 of 37 (2.7%) in the Open Bankart repair group had a recurrent anterior dislocation whereas this was present in 21 of 39 (53.8%) of those in the non-surgical group (p=0.0011). All of these patients who had re-dislocations had Baker type 2 or 3 lesions.
- No significant difference was seen in remaining non-dislocators between both groups with respect to Constant scores.
- Of the 36 patients in the Bankart repair group without dislocations, 7% had positive apprehension test, and 4% had a grade 1 load-and-shift test.
- Out of those who did not sustain a redislocation in the nonsurgical group, 39% had a positive apprehension test, and 39% had a grade 1 or 2 load-and-shift test.
- 80% with Type 2 lesions, and 53% with Type 3 lesions (in nonsurgical group) sustained a recurrence within two years following trauma.
- At the ten year follow up period (completed telephone interview and questionnaire), 9% of patients in repair group had recurrent dislocation. When grading was completed using the Oxford Shoulder Score, 53% had excellent results and 17% had good results.
- In the nonsurgical group, 62% patients sustained recurrent anterior dislocation. 74% had unsatisfactory results due to instability or pain (Oxford scale) at the ten year follow up period.
De que é que me devo lembrar mais?
Open Bankart repair as treatment for anterior dislocations of the shoulder joint, yielded lower rates of recurrence, as compared to conservative treatment. These results were seen at both the two year and ten year follow up periods.
Como é que isto afectará o tratamento dos meus doentes?
The results of this study indicated that open repair was a more effective treatment as compared to a conservative method in reducing rate of redislocation, in a population of young individuals with anterior shoulder dislocation.
AVISO LEGAL
O conteúdo desta página destina-se apenas a fins informativos e não pretende substituir o aconselhamento, diagnóstico ou tratamento médico profissional. Se necessitar de tratamento médico, procure sempre o conselho do seu médico ou dirija-se ao serviço de urgência mais próximo. As opiniões, crenças e pontos de vista expressos pelos indivíduos no conteúdo encontrado nesta página não reflectem as opiniões, crenças e pontos de vista da OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 artigos mensais GRATUITOS desbloqueados
