Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: Open repair effective in reducing recurrence rates .
Este estudio ha sido identificado como potencialmente de alto impacto.
La métrica de alto impacto de OE, impulsada por la IA, estima la influencia que probablemente tendrá un artículo integrando señales tanto de la revista en la que se publica como del contenido científico del propio artículo.
Desarrollado mediante el procesamiento del lenguaje natural más avanzado, el modelo de Alto Impacto de OE predice con mayor precisión el futuro rendimiento de las citas de un estudio que el factor de impacto de la revista por sí solo.
Esto permite reconocer antes las investigaciones clínicamente significativas y ayuda a los lectores a centrarse en los artículos con más probabilidades de configurar la práctica futura.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(11):273 Arthroscopy. 2007 Feb;23(2):118-23.76 patients with first-time traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder joint were randomized to either receive open Bankart surgical repair, or conservative treatment. This study aimed to compare rates of recurrence between treatments. The results at both the two year and ten year follow up periods indicated that open repair reduced the recurrence rate of shoulder dislocations in comparison to conservative treatment.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Sí = 1
Incierto = 0,5
No relevante = 0
No = 0
La evaluación de los criterios de información evalúa la transparencia con la que los autores informan de las características metodológicas y del ensayo dentro de la publicación. La evaluación se divide en cinco categorías que se presentan a continuación.
1/4
Randomization
2/4
Outcome Measurements
3/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
3/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
El Índice de Fragilidad es una herramienta que ayuda en la interpretación de hallazgos significativos, proporcionando una medida de fuerza para un resultado. El Índice de Fragilidad representa el número de eventos consecutivos que es necesario añadir a un resultado dicotómico para que el hallazgo deje de ser significativo. Un número pequeño representa un hallazgo más débil y un número grande un hallazgo más fuerte.
¿Por qué se necesitaba ahora este estudio?
Dislocations of the shoulder joint are the most frequent type of dislocations in the body. With traumatic anterior dislocation, there is a high risk recurrence; however, it is still uncertain if surgical repair of Bankart lesions produces a significant reduction in recurrence compared to conservative treatment. Recurrent instability of the shoulder joint can negatively affect one's performance in daily activities as well as sports. This study is of importance, as there have been few long-term, high quality studies looking at surgical versus conservative treatments.
¿Cuál era la pregunta principal de la investigación?
Does open Bankart surgical repair of lesions reduce the rate of recurrence of dislocations, as compared to conservative treatment, in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations, over a ten year follow up period?
- At the two year follow up period, 1 of 37 (2.7%) in the Open Bankart repair group had a recurrent anterior dislocation whereas this was present in 21 of 39 (53.8%) of those in the non-surgical group (p=0.0011). All of these patients who had re-dislocations had Baker type 2 or 3 lesions.
- No significant difference was seen in remaining non-dislocators between both groups with respect to Constant scores.
- Of the 36 patients in the Bankart repair group without dislocations, 7% had positive apprehension test, and 4% had a grade 1 load-and-shift test.
- Out of those who did not sustain a redislocation in the nonsurgical group, 39% had a positive apprehension test, and 39% had a grade 1 or 2 load-and-shift test.
- 80% with Type 2 lesions, and 53% with Type 3 lesions (in nonsurgical group) sustained a recurrence within two years following trauma.
- At the ten year follow up period (completed telephone interview and questionnaire), 9% of patients in repair group had recurrent dislocation. When grading was completed using the Oxford Shoulder Score, 53% had excellent results and 17% had good results.
- In the nonsurgical group, 62% patients sustained recurrent anterior dislocation. 74% had unsatisfactory results due to instability or pain (Oxford scale) at the ten year follow up period.
¿Qué es lo que más debo recordar?
Open Bankart repair as treatment for anterior dislocations of the shoulder joint, yielded lower rates of recurrence, as compared to conservative treatment. These results were seen at both the two year and ten year follow up periods.
¿Cómo afectará esto al cuidado de mis pacientes?
The results of this study indicated that open repair was a more effective treatment as compared to a conservative method in reducing rate of redislocation, in a population of young individuals with anterior shoulder dislocation.
DESCARGO DE RESPONSABILIDAD
El contenido de esta página tiene únicamente fines informativos y no pretende sustituir el consejo, diagnóstico o tratamiento médico profesional. Si necesita tratamiento médico, busque siempre el consejo de su médico o acuda al servicio de urgencias más cercano. Las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista expresados por las personas sobre el contenido que se encuentra en esta página no reflejan las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista de OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 artículos mensuales GRATIS desbloqueados
