ACE Report Cover
Adaptability treadmill vs. conventional treadmill and PT in post-hip fracture rehab
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Sprache
Download Download Download
Herunterladen
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Zitieren
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoriten
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Sprache
Download Download Download
Herunterladen
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Zitieren
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoriten

PHYSICAL THERAPY & REHAB

The efficacy of treadmill training with and without projected visual context for improving walking ability and reducing fall incidence and fear of falling in older adults with fall-related hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2017;5(17):7 BMC Geriatr. 2016 Dec 28;16(1):215

70 patients who had suffered a fall-related hip fracture and were undergoing acute postoperative rehabilitation for 6 weeks were randomized to one of three regimens: adaptability treadmill training in addition to usual physical therapy sessions; conventional treadmill training in addition to usual physical therapy sessions; or usual physical therapy sessions alone. Patients were assessed for measures of walking ability, walking adaptability, fear of falling and the incidence of falls at the end of the 6-week programs, and at 4-week and 12-month follow-up. All three groups significantly improved in general walking ability, general health, and fear of falling over time. The only significant differences noted in a priori analyses were a greater increase in the Functional Ambulation Category in the conventional treadmill group compared to the other two groups after 4 weeks, and a smaller reduction in walking speed during the 10-meter walking test with obstacles in the adaptability treadmill group compared to the conventional treadmill group. All other outcomes did not significantly differ between the three groups.


Details zur Finanzierung der Veröffentlichung +
Finanzierung:
Non-Industry funded
Interessenkonflikte:
None disclosed

Risiko der Voreingenommenheit

4/10

Kriterien für die Berichterstattung

16/20

Fragilitäts-Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Ja = 1

Ungewiss = 0.5

Nicht relevant = 0

Nein = 0

Die Bewertung der Berichtskriterien bewertet die Transparenz, mit der die Autoren die methodischen und studienspezifischen Merkmale der Studie in der Veröffentlichung angeben. Die Bewertung ist in fünf Kategorien unterteilt, die im Folgenden vorgestellt werden.

1/4

Randomization

4/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

Der Fragilitätsindex ist ein Instrument, das bei der Interpretation signifikanter Ergebnisse hilft und ein Maß für die Stärke eines Ergebnisses liefert. Der Fragilitätsindex gibt die Anzahl der aufeinanderfolgenden Ereignisse an, die zu einem dichotomen Ergebnis hinzugefügt werden müssen, damit das Ergebnis nicht mehr signifikant ist. Eine kleine Zahl steht für ein schwächeres Ergebnis und eine große Zahl für ein stärkeres Ergebnis.

Warum wurde diese Studie jetzt benötigt?

Falls within the elderly population are common and can result in serious injuries, such as hip fracture. Accordingly, interventions for fall avoidance and prevention are an important area of research currently. Walking adaptability and stepping training using a specialized treadmill is an intervention that has been suggested to reduce the incidence of falls in elderly individuals, though efficacy has not been investigated in a number of trials previously.

Was war die wichtigste Forschungsfrage?

In elderly patients following a fall-related hip fracture, does adaptability treadmill training lead to significantly better walking ability, significantly reduced fear of falling, and significantly lower incidence of fall when compared to either conventional treadmill training or usual physical therapy?

Merkmale der Studie +
Bevölkerung:
70 patients, over the age of 65 years, with a hip fracture related to a fall and within 3 days of admission to a residential or rehabilitation center following discharge from the hospital.
Intervention:
Adaptability treadmill group: Patients participated in 15 sessions of adaptability treadmill training (C-Mill; Motekforce Link) in addition to 15 supervised sessions of usual physical therapy (described below). Training exercises included guided stepping using regularly or irregularly spaced markers, obstacle avoidance, moving walking zones, and interactive adaptability games illuminated on the treadmill walk surface while set at a comfortable walking pace. The 30 total sessions were completed over 6 weeks (5 per week), and were 40 minutes in duration each. (n=24; Mean age: 82.9+/-6.5)
Vergleich:
Conventional treadmill group: Patients participated in 15 sessions of conventional treadmill training in addition to 15 supervised sessions of usual physical therapy. Sessions were completed at a speed comfortable for participants. The 30 total sessions were completed over 6 weeks (5 per week), and were 40 minutes in duration each. (n=23; mean age: 83.9+/-5.5) Usual physical therapy group: Patients participants in 30 supervised sessions of usual physical therapy. Sessions consisted of exercises for lower limb strengthening exercises, balance transfer, overground walking, and daily activities. The 30 sessions were completed over 6 weeks (5 per week), and were 40 minutes in duration each. (n=23; Mean age: 83.3+/-8.0)
Ergebnisse:
Primary outcomes were walking ability and walking adaptability. Walking ability was assessed using the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, the Elderly Mobility Scale, the Timed Up-and-Go test, the Functional Ambulation Category, the 10 meter Walking Test (10MWT), and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living, and walking adaptability was assessed using the 10MWT with obstacles, and the 10MWT while simultaneously completing a cognitive task. Secondary outcomes included the Falls Efficacy Scale International for fear of falling, and the incidence of falls. In addition, general health was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100), the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Quality of Life (HOOS-Q), and the Trail Making Tests - part A and B.
Methoden:
RCT
Zeit:
Patients were assessed at the end of the 6-week programs, and at 4-week and 12-month follow-up.

Was waren die wichtigsten Ergebnisse?

  • For measures of walking ability, no significant differences were observed between the three groups in the outcome of the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, the Elderly Mobility Scale, the Timed Up-and-Go test or the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (all p>0.05).
  • Increase in FAC from baseline was significantly greater in the conventional treadmill group compared to the adaptability treadmill group and usual physical therapy group at post-intervention and after 4-week follow-up (p<0.05); the difference between groups in the increase to 12-month follow-up was not significant (p=0.417).
  • For measures of walking adaptability, the only significant difference between groups was a significantly smaller decrease in walking speed with obstacle avoidance during the 10MWT at post-intervention in the adaptability treadmill group (-21.48+/-18.13%) compared to the conventional treadmill group (-35.91+/-18.56%) (p=0.017); difference compared to the usual physical therapy group (-31.77+/-15.52%) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.070).
  • The difference between groups in the decrease in walking speed with obstacle avoidance during the 10MWT at 4-week follow-up was not significant (p=0.091).
  • Falls Efficacy Scale International scores did not significantly differ between the three groups at post-intervention, 4-week follow-up, or 12-month follow-up (p>0.05).
  • The incidence of falls included 11 falls among 4 patients of the adaptability treadmill group, 11 falls among 5 patients of the conventional treadmill group, and 20 falls among 9 patients of the usual physical therapy group; the differences between groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Was sollte ich mir besonders merken?

In post-hip fracture rehabilitation in the elderly, adaptability treadmill training over 6 weeks in addition to standard physical therapy session results in statistically similar results to conventional treadmill training and usual physical therapy when considering measures of walking ability, walking adaptability, fear of falling and incidence of falls. The only significant differences noted in a priori analyses were a greater increase in the Functional Ambulation Category in the conventional treadmill group after 4 weeks and a smaller reduction in walking speed during the 10-meter walking test with obstacles in the adaptability treadmill group compared to the conventional treadmill group.

Wie wird sich dies auf die Behandlung meiner Patienten auswirken?

The results of this study suggest that adaptability treadmill training for elderly patients following hip fracture produces similar results to that of either conventional training or a usual physical therapy program for 6 weeks. However, with only 70 patients enrolled and randomized, the study fell well short of the original 126 sample size based on previous calculations. For this reason, the study is likely underpowered for any clear conclusion on the efficacy of adaptability treadmill for these patients. Therefore, additional studies are required before its potential role in post-hip fracture rehabilitation is determined.

HAFTUNGSAUSSCHLUSS

Der Inhalt dieser Seite dient nur zu Informationszwecken und ist nicht als Ersatz für professionelle medizinische Beratung, Diagnose oder Behandlung gedacht. Wenn Sie eine medizinische Behandlung benötigen, wenden Sie sich immer an Ihren Arzt oder suchen Sie die nächstgelegene Notaufnahme auf. Die Meinungen, Überzeugungen und Standpunkte, die von den Personen auf dieser Seite geäußert werden, spiegeln nicht die Meinungen, Überzeugungen und Standpunkte von OrthoEvidence wider.

0 von 4 monatliche KOSTENLOSE Artikel freigeschaltet
Sie haben Ihr Limit von 4 kostenlosen Artikeln in diesem Monat erreicht

Zugang zu OrthoEvidence für nur $1,99 pro Woche.

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Beweisen. Jederzeit kündbar.
  • Kritische Beurteilungen der neuesten, hochwirksamen randomisierten kontrollierten Studien und systematischen Übersichten in der Orthopädie
  • Zugang zu OrthoEvidence-Podcast-Inhalten, einschließlich Kooperationen mit dem Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Interviews mit international anerkannten Chirurgen und Diskussionsrunden zu orthopädischen Neuigkeiten und Themen
  • Abonnement von The Pulse, einem zweimal wöchentlich erscheinenden evidenzbasierten Newsletter, der Ihnen helfen soll, bessere klinische Entscheidungen zu treffen
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Willkommen zurück!
Passwort vergessen?
Starten Sie Ihre KOSTENLOSE Testversion noch heute!

Ihr Konto ist verbunden mit
und umfasst den kostenlosen Zugang zu OrthoEvidence


ODER
Passwort vergessen?

ODER
Bitte überprüfen Sie Ihre E-Mail

Wenn ein Konto mit der angegebenen E-Mail-Adresse existiert, wird Ihnen eine E-Mail zum Zurücksetzen des Passworts zugesandt. Wenn Sie keine E-Mail sehen, überprüfen Sie bitte Ihren Spam- oder Junk-Ordner.

Für weitere Hilfe, kontaktieren Sie unser Support-Team.

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um diese Funktion zu aktivieren

Um auf diese Funktion zugreifen zu können, müssen Sie bei einem aktiven OrthoEvidence-Konto angemeldet sein. Bitte melden Sie sich an oder erstellen Sie ein KOSTENLOSES Testkonto.

Übersetzen ACE Report

OrthoEvidence nutzt einen externen Übersetzungsdienst, um Inhalte in mehreren Sprachen zugänglich zu machen. Bitte beachten Sie, dass trotz aller Bemühungen um Genauigkeit die Übersetzungen nicht immer perfekt sind.

Wie man dies zitiert ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Adaptability treadmill vs. conventional treadmill and PT in post-hip fracture rehab. OE Journal. 2017;5(17):7. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/adaptability-treadmill-vs-conventional-treadmill-and-pt-in-post-hip-fracture-rehab

Zitat kopieren
Bitte melden Sie sich an, um diese Funktion zu aktivieren

Um auf diese Funktion zugreifen zu können, müssen Sie bei einem aktiven OrthoEvidence-Konto angemeldet sein. Bitte melden Sie sich an oder erstellen Sie ein KOSTENLOSES Testkonto.

Premium-Mitglied-Funktion

Um auf diese Funktion zugreifen zu können, müssen Sie bei einem Premium-Konto von OrthoEvidence angemeldet sein.

Teilen Sie dies ACE Report