ARTHROPLASTY
2026 AAHKS Annual Meeting: DISTINCT RCT: Dual Mobility vs. Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
Epub Ahead of Print
2440 patients aged over 50 years undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures (FNF) were randomized by hospital to receive dual mobility (DM) THA (n=1228) or conventional THA (n=1212). The primary outcome was revision surgery at 2 years, including all-cause revision and revision for dislocation, infection, fracture, or loosening. Outcomes were assessed up to 2 years postoperatively. Overall, the results revealed no significant differences between DM and conventional THA in all-cause revision, revision for dislocation, or revision for fracture. These findings suggested that DM THA did not provide additional protection against revision surgery compared with conventional THA in patients with FNF.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
