No clinical benefit in gender-specific knee prostheses in females after TKA .
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2014;2(19):14 Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):415-21Six randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, the purpose of which was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of gender-specific prostheses to standard unisex prostheses in female patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Pooled data showed no significant benefit to using gender-specific components for total knee arthroplasty in females.
Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?
Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?
Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?
Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?
Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?
Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?
Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?
Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?
Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?
How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?
Oui = 1
Incertain = 0,5
Non pertinent = 0
Non = 0
L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.
4/4
Introduction
4/4
Accessing Data
2/4
Analysing Data
4/4
Results
3/4
Discussion
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.
Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?
Recent studies have identified gender differences in the anatomy of the distal femur, introducing the concept of gender-specific knee prostheses. As women account for a greater percentage of knee arthroplasties than men, the potential effect of gender on functional outcomes and implant survivorship has been identified. Current studies have failed to establish consensus; therefore this meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical and radiographic results of total knee arthroplasty in female patients receiving gender-specific prostheses to standard unisex prostheses.
Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?
Are gender-specific knee prostheses clinically favourable to unisex knee prostheses in female patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty?
- Data pooled from 5 studies suggested similar postoperative pain between gender specific knees (49/446 experienced pain) and unisex knees (48/446 experienced pain).
- 5 studies reported active range of motion of the knee in supine position and 3 studies in the weight bearing position; no statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of active range of motion in non-weight bearing (WMD: 0.57; 95% CI: -2.4 to 3.5; p=0.7) or weight-bearing conditions (WMD: 0.66; 95% CI: -2.0 to 3.4; p=0.6).
- KSS (reported in 4 studies), HSS (reported in 4 studies) and WOMAC (reported in 3 studies) scores were similar between treatment groups.
- From 3 studies, there was no statistically significant difference in preference of prosthesis (RR=1.1; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.8; p=0.7). 3 studies reported the mean satisfaction score was similar in both groups (WMD: 0.04, CI: -0.52 to 0.60; p=0.9).
- 4 studies revealed that the gender-specific femoral component did not fit better than the standard femoral component (RR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.56; p<0.001).
- Postoperative complications were reported in 4 studies, all of which had low complication rates and were comparable between groups (RR=1.0; 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.3; p=1.0; I-squared: 0%).
- 5 studies mentioned radiographic results, but no statistically significant differences between the groups were found.
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?
Gender-specific knee prostheses did not provide clinical advantages over unisex knee designs in female patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty with respect to pain, range of motion, functional scores, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, femoral component fit, or radiographic results.
Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?
Despite theoretical benefits, there does not appear to be an advantage stemming from using gender specific knee prostheses in women undergoing total knee arthroplasty. However, the trials in this meta-analysis were limited by short follow-up periods. To better evaluate the comparative efficacy of both types of prostheses, longer studies are needed.
AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ
Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
