Catching Up with special guest Sanjeev Sabharwal (Editor, JBJS Reviews.
Unlock this Podcast
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this Videos
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!
Sanjeev Sabharwal
MD, MPH
View More
How should orthopaedic review journals evolve in an era where AI can synthesize evidence in seconds yet methodological rigor remains paramount? This discussion explores the future direction of JBJS Reviews through the lens of editorial leadership, emphasizing the enduring value of structured critical analysis, global representation, and principled peer review. The conversation highlights how high-quality review articles shape clinical understanding by distilling complex literature into actionable insights, while reinforcing the importance of transparency regarding AI-assisted writing. Strategic priorities include engaging trainees, strengthening methodological oversight, leveraging librarian expertise in systematic searches, and expanding innovative formats such as debates and commentaries to enhance accessibility. Ultimately, the dialogue underscores that despite rapid technological change, credibility in orthopaedic scholarship will continue to depend on thoughtful question formulation, robust peer review, and commitment to evidence integrity.
DISCLAIMER
This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
