Statistics and Methodology in Orthopaedics, with special guests Sameer Parpia and Sheila Sprague.
Unlock this Podcast
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this Videos
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Sheila Sprague
PhD
Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, McMaster University
View MoreThe episode centers on the Journal’s renewed emphasis on rigorous statistics and methodology, featuring insights from senior editors Drs. Sprague and Parpia. They outline how to judge when RCTs are feasible, stressing equipoise, event rates, and the value of pilot phases. They discuss growing interest in Bayesian approaches, cautioning that priors must be prespecified and justified. Both underscore that strong methods cannot be retrofitted after the fact, whereas statistical analyses can be corrected if data are available. Clear research questions, adherence to CONSORT, polished writing, and transparent reporting are highlighted as essential for high-quality submissions.
DISCLAIMER
This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.