Fragility Index: How robust are your results ?
Many orthopedic trials rely on dichotomous outcomes, but a p-value alone doesn’t tell the whole story about how stable those findings really are. The fragility index offers a simple way to gauge that stability by asking how many patients would need to switch from “no event” to “event” before a statistically significant result disappears. When that number is small, the result is fragile and should be interpreted cautiously—especially if more patients were lost to follow-up than the fragility index itself. Examples from tibial fracture research show how quickly significance can vanish with only a few outcome changes. Across orthopedics, reviews consistently reveal low fragility indices, often between 1 and 3, highlighting how vulnerable many RCT conclusions are and underscoring the need for larger, more robust trials.
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics