“BIAS” Detectives 101: Top 3 Things You Need to Know .
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - OE Original
OE Journal. 2019;7(5):1Bias threatens the credibility of randomized trials by pushing results away from the truth in a predictable direction, unlike chance, which creates random variation around the true effect. Key risks arise when allocation is poorly randomized or concealed, when blinding of patients, providers, or assessors is absent, when outcomes are missing, or when selective reporting occurs. These flaws undermine confidence in treatment effects and can mislead clinical decisions. Careful appraisal of these domains—supported by structured risk-of-bias tools—helps determine whether study findings are trustworthy enough to inform practice.
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!