To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar 10-yr outcome between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2017

Similar 10-yr outcome between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized TKA

Vol: 6| Issue: 11| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing vs Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: 10-Year Follow-Up

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):818-823

Contributing Authors:
LA Beaupre DW Johnston B Sharifi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

100 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either a posterior cruciate-retaining implant or a posterior-cruciate substituting implant. Patients were assessed for function, quality of life, and the incidence of reoperation over a 10-year follow-up. No significant differences between groups were observed in any outcome measure.

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.