To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Cemented versus hydroxyapatite fixation of the femoral component of the Freeman- Samuelson total knee replacement-A RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jan;89(1):39-44.

Contributing Authors:
J Uvehammer J Karrholm L Carlsson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 patients (54 knees) with non-inflammatory arthritis were randomly distributed to receive a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component or a cemented femoral component for total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Patients were also stratified to receive either the rotating, standard or Freeman-Samuelson (FS) 1000 component articulating surfaces. Radiostereometry analysis was performed at 3, 12 and 24 m...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue