
Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants

Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants
Cemented versus hydroxyapatite fixation of the femoral component of the Freeman- Samuelson total knee replacement-A RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jan;89(1):39-44.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
50 patients (54 knees) with non-inflammatory arthritis were randomly distributed to receive a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component or a cemented femoral component for total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Patients were also stratified to receive either the rotating, standard or Freeman-Samuelson (FS) 1000 component articulating surfaces. Radiostereometry analysis was performed at 3, 12 and 24 m...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.