Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants
Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants
Cemented versus hydroxyapatite fixation of the femoral component of the Freeman- Samuelson total knee replacement-A RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jan;89(1):39-44.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
50 patients (54 knees) with non-inflammatory arthritis were randomly distributed to receive a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component or a cemented femoral component for total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Patients were also stratified to receive either the rotating, standard or Freeman-Samuelson (FS) 1000 component articulating surfaces. Radiostereometry analysis was performed at 3, 12 and 24 m...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.