To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ACL: Press-fit and conventional techniques display similar tunnel volume enlargement

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

ACL: Press-fit and conventional techniques display similar tunnel volume enlargement

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:161| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Does press-fit technique reduce tunnel volume enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons? A prospective randomized computed tomography study

Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.007

Contributing Authors:
DH Hwang GM Shetty JI Kim JH Kwon JK Song M Muñoz JS Lee KW Nha

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

69 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were randomized to evaluate whether the press-fit technique reduced tunnel volume enlargement (TVE) and improved clinical outcome compared to a conventional technique. Patients were assessed at the 1 year follow-up using both clinical and computer tomography outcomes. There were no significant differences at the follow-up in re...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue