
Non resorbable PEEK implants superior to resorbable PLDLLA implants

Non resorbable PEEK implants superior to resorbable PLDLLA implants
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):618-22.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
26 patients with chronic back pain and irradiating lower extremity symptoms underwent instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion using either a nonresorbable Telamon PEEK cage or a resorbable Telamon PLDDLA cage, to aid in fusion. Results of this randomized study indicate that almost all clinical outcomes improved for the PEEK group at 2-year evaluation when compared to preoperative scores; ho...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.