LOGIN
Minimally invasive method does not provide clinical benefits compared to conventional TKA
August 2013
Minimally invasive method does not provide clinical benefits compared to conventional TKA
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes following minimally invasive to conventional exposure for total knee arthroplasty.
Knee. 2012 Jan;19(1):1-7. Epub 2010 Dec 31Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
18 independent studies (n=1582 TKAs) were identified which compared minimally invasive and conventional exposure total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. Analysis of the results indicated that the minimally invasive procedure cohort had a significantly smaller incision and a better knee flexion range of motion. All other clinical and radiological outcomes were comparable between these minimally i...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.