To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

An isolated bioinductive repair vs sutured repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

An isolated bioinductive repair vs sutured repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:34| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

An isolated bioinductive repair vs sutured repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2-year results of a double blinded, randomized controlled trial.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg . 2024 Sep;33(9):1894-1904.

Contributing Authors:
JA Camacho Chacón V Roda Rojo A Martin Martinez J Cuenca Espierrez V Garcia Calvo JM Calderón Meza C Martin Hernandez

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients with small/medium full-thickness supraspinatus tears (≤2.5 cm) and intact rotator cables were randomized to receive either isolated bioinductive repair (IBR, n=30) or conventional sutured repair (n=30). The primary outcome was histologic tendon quality at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included tendon healing (via MRI), tendon thickness, pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASE...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue