To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing Operative vs Non-Operative Management of Unstable Medial Malleolus Fractures for Function

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2024

Comparing Operative vs Non-Operative Management of Unstable Medial Malleolus Fractures for Function

Vol: 306| Issue: 4| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Unstable Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan; 7(1): e2351308.

Contributing Authors:
TH Carter WM Oliver KR Bell C Graham AD Duckworth TO White

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

154 adult patients with closed, unstable bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures requiring surgery were randomized in a prospective clinical trial. The patients were allocated to either internal fixation (n=78) or nonfixation (n=76) of the well-reduced medial malleolus fracture after fibular stabilization. The primary outcome was the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), a functional score cover...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue