To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No Difference in 1 Year Clinical Outcomes with RC Repair vs Physiotherapy for Traumatic RC Tear

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2021

No Difference in 1 Year Clinical Outcomes with RC Repair vs Physiotherapy for Traumatic RC Tear

Vol: 10| Issue: 1| Number:24| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Surgery and physiotherapy were both successful in the treatment of small, acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized trial.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):459-470.

Contributing Authors:
MC Ranebo HCB Hallgren LE Adolfsson T Holmgren

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty-eight patients who sustained traumatic small rotator cuff tears, mainly of the supraspinatus tendon, were randomized to receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (n=32) plus physical therapy or physical therapy alone (n=26). The primary outcome of interest was pain and function evaluated using the Constant-Murley (CM) score (i.e. total pain, activities of daily living, internal rotation, exte...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue